German travelers’ preferences for travel vaccines assessed by a discrete choice experiment

Poulos, Christine; Curran, Desmond; Anastassopoulou, Anastassia; Moerlooze, Laurence De

doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.004

Cited by 25 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The refusers indicated that they were too busy to get the vaccine; likewise, the vaccines were too expensive. A discrete choice experiment study by Poulos et al. (2018) report a significant inverse association between cost and German travelers' vaccine uptake and their preference decisions.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The literature further highlights the cost and time involved in travel vaccination as major concerns ( Gautret, Tantawichien, Hai, & Piyaphanee, 2011 ; Goodman et al., 2014 ; Poulos et al., 2018 ; Wang et al., 2019 ). These two factors reflect affordability concerns, which are the inability of individuals to afford travel vaccination, both in terms of financial and non-financial costs ( Thomson, Robinson, & Vallée-Tourangeau, 2016 ).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2016) ; Wang et al. (2019) Time concerns Vaccination would result in waste of time or loss of time convenience Crockett and Keystone (2005) ; Poulos et al. (2018) ; Thomson et al.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Travelers without protection against vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) may get become sick when exposed. In the case of contagious diseases, they might facilitate the disease spread while traveling and upon returning home ( Poulos, Curran, Anastassopoulou, & De Moerlooze, 2018 ). Based on data from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network from 49 specialized travel/tropical medicine clinics on six continents, Boggild et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Beyond fragmentary: A proposed measure for travel vaccination concerns

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The travel medicine literature points to travelers' concerns as significant promoters of their under-vaccinations. Therefore, this study researches the hitherto understudied concept of vaccination concern and its theoretical scope in the international travel space. It attempts a conceptualization of the concept by delimiting its theoretical scope and proposes a measure for it. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was used to conduct four interlocking studies using data from a netnography, field interviews, and surveys among varied international travelers. A scale with six dimensions, comprising safety, efficacy, cost, time, access, and autonomy concerns were revealed. The scale significantly explained mainstream and segments-based tourists' uptake attitudes and behavior for their eligible vaccines. The findings suggest that anti-travel vax sentiments and public vax sentiments despite conceptually similar are considerably distinct. The broad nature of the scale and its prediction of travelers' vaccine uptake make it clinically relevant for tracking and resolving concerns for increased vaccine uptake.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2016) ; Wang et al. (2019) Time concerns Vaccination would result in waste of time or loss of time convenience Crockett and Keystone (2005) ; Poulos et al. (2018) ; Thomson et al.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Beyond fragmentary: A proposed measure for travel vaccination concerns

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Discrete-choice experiments (DCE) are increasingly used to evaluate individuals' vaccination preferences and underlying decision-making. [28][29][30][31][32] While DCE allows participants to choose from a pre-defined set of attributes, an ADCE format allows more individualized choices, with successive choice scenarios adapted to previous questions in an interactive manner. In this ADCE approach, the respondent is first asked to identify their most ideal vaccination scenario, based upon key determinants that may influence choice (source of infection and likelihood of infection to the newborn, duration of protection, cost, vaccination location, recommendation by doctors or health authorities and supporting information and other opinions).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Attributes influencing parental decision-making to receive the Tdap vaccine to reduce the risk of pertussis transmission to their newborn – outcome of a cross-sectional conjoint experiment in Spain and Italy

Ledent

Gabutti

Bekker‐Grob

et al. 2019

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exploring patient preference heterogeneity for pharmacological treatments for chronic pain: A latent class analysis

Walsh

Boeri

Abraham

et al. 2022

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Several pharmaceutical treatments for chronic pain caused by osteoarthritis (OA) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) are available or currently under development, each associated with different adverse events (AEs) and efficacy profiles. It is therefore important to understand what trade-offs patients are willing to make when choosing between treatments. Methods:A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with 437 adults with chronic pain caused by OA and/or CLBP. Respondents were presented with a series of scenarios and asked to choose between pairs of hypothetical treatments, each defined by six attributes: level of symptom control; risks of heart attack, rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and dependency; frequency and mode of administration and cost. Attributes were based on known profiles of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids and injected nerve growth factor inhibitors, the last of which were under clinical development at the time of the study. Data were analysed using a latent class (LC) model to explore preference heterogeneity.Results: Overall, respondents considered improving symptom control and reducing risk of physical dependency to be the most important attributes. The LC analysis identified four participant classes: an 'efficacy-focused' class (33.7%), a 'cost-averse' class (29.4%), a 'physical-dependence-averse' class (19.6%) and a 'needle-averse' class (17.3%). Subgroup membership was incompletely predicted by participant age and their responses to comprehension questions.Conclusions: Preference heterogeneity across respondents indicates a need for a personalized approach to offering treatment options. Symptom improvement, cost, physical dependence and route of administration might be important to different patients.

show abstract

German travelers’ preferences for travel vaccines assessed by a discrete choice experiment

Cited by 25 publications

References 36 publications

Beyond fragmentary: A proposed measure for travel vaccination concerns

Beyond fragmentary: A proposed measure for travel vaccination concerns

Attributes influencing parental decision-making to receive the Tdap vaccine to reduce the risk of pertussis transmission to their newborn – outcome of a cross-sectional conjoint experiment in Spain and Italy

Exploring patient preference heterogeneity for pharmacological treatments for chronic pain: A latent class analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About