2018
DOI: 10.3390/nano8010038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Ru@Pt Core-Shell Catalysts for Enhanced Electrochemical Oxygen Reduction Mass Activity and Stability

Abstract: Improving the performance of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysts is essential for the commercial efficacy of many renewable energy technologies, including low temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs). Herein, we report highly active and stable carbon-supported Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles (Ru@Pt/C) prepared by a wet chemical synthesis technique. Through rotating disc electrode testing, the Ru@Pt/C achieves an ORR Pt mass-based activity of 0.50 A mgPt−1 at 0.9 V versus the reversible hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 shows cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of the Pt catalyst (above) and the Ru@Pt core-shell catalyst (below) in 0.1 mol dm −3 HClO 4 at a sweep rate of 10 mV s −1 . These CVs are similar to those previously recorded by Tsypkin et al [16], Bernechea et al [46], Yang et al [19], Chen et al [47], and Jackson et al [48] for Ru@Pt core-shell catalysts. Whereas the CV of Pt/C displays two clearly distinguishable peaks related to under-potential deposition of hydrogen (H UPD ) at approximately 0.2 V and below, as is typical for such catalysts [49], the corresponding region for the Ru@Pt catalyst shows considerably less structure.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…2 shows cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of the Pt catalyst (above) and the Ru@Pt core-shell catalyst (below) in 0.1 mol dm −3 HClO 4 at a sweep rate of 10 mV s −1 . These CVs are similar to those previously recorded by Tsypkin et al [16], Bernechea et al [46], Yang et al [19], Chen et al [47], and Jackson et al [48] for Ru@Pt core-shell catalysts. Whereas the CV of Pt/C displays two clearly distinguishable peaks related to under-potential deposition of hydrogen (H UPD ) at approximately 0.2 V and below, as is typical for such catalysts [49], the corresponding region for the Ru@Pt catalyst shows considerably less structure.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The commercial GDL, composed by PTFE layer, was directly compared with the new designed nanostructured-GDL. The electrolyte is a water-based solution containing 12mM of sodium acetate, used as organic matter, and other compounds (5.8 mM of ammonium chloride and phosphate buffer saline solution (PBS) [10][11][12]) suitable for the preservation of metabolic activity of microorganisms. Titanium wires were used to ensure a good electrical contact and both anode and cathode were connected with a multichannel data acquisition unit (Agilent 34972 A).…”
Section: Scmfcs Architecture and Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jackson and colleagues followed with recent work in which they prepared durable and active Ru@Pt catalysts using a wet chemical method [50]. In their study, the researchers sought to evaluate the impact of varying nanoparticle precursor ratios, finding that the most active catalyst was that prepared with an Ru@Pt ratio of 1:1.…”
Section: Element Selection: D-block Deliberationsmentioning
confidence: 99%