Impact of warm ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy on renal function – is it really a matter of time?

Abstract

Impact of warm ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy on renal function -is it really a matter of time?In the latest edition of the BJUI, Lee et al. [1] have revisited the question of defining the ideal limit of warm ischaemia time (WIT) and its impact on postoperative renal function in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN).Partial nephrectomy has replaced radical nephrectomy as the preferred treatment for T1 renal masses. This publication challenges the theory that ischaemic nephropathy is inevitable if the renal vessels are clamped beyond 30 min, leading to a long-term decline in renal function.The authors in this series are to be commended for analysing a prospectively collected database on 1 816 patients in two institutions who underwent PN for clinical T1 renal tumours. Their primary endpoint was to investigate the impact of prolonged WIT on long-term renal function focusing on two clinical endpoints; chronic kidney disease, as estimated by an estimated GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , and major renal function deterioration defined as an increase in creatinine of >25% of the preoperative value.Warm ischaemia time using a threshold of 30 min created two comparative groups. Patients were followed for up to 40 months after surgery. In addition to this, patients were further sub-stratified into five subgroups, critiquing the effect of WIT up to 50 min. A key feature of this paper [1] is the use of propensity score matching to adjust for any potential preoperative confounders affecting postoperative renal function, a technique also allowing matching of the two groups.The authors correctly emphasise the direct relationship between tumour size and duration of WIT, with larger tumours requiring excision of more renal parenchyma and adding to 'on-clamp' time. Tumour size and renal function are vital determinants of suitability for PN [2]. This publication [1] clearly demonstrates that although large tumour size equated with prolonged clamp time, this was not the sole determinant of impaired long-term renal function.The importance of other independent variables such as preoperative renal function, patient age and preserved renal parenchyma have been highlighted here as potentially playing a greater role than was previously appreciated.The second and possibly more remarkable finding from this paper is that ischaemic time was not an independent predictor of ultimate renal function after PN. This contrasts with most other reports to date. Although not recommending using a WIT of up to 50 min, the results here suggest this may not be relevant to future renal function. It appears that long-term renal function after PN is primarily determined by the quantity and quality of renal parenchyma preserved, although the type and duration of ischaemia remain the most important modifiable factors, and warrant further evaluation [3].When discussing this topic, it is interesting to refer to the initial bench work on this issue. The current approach to WIT is extrapolated from data derived from the histological changes occur...

Research Article Laparoscopic nephrectomy for the treatment of renal tumors at Thanh Hoa General Hospital in Vietnam

“…Also in robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), tumor complexity does not affect operative time, while for LPN it does (Faiena et al 2014;Bolton and Lynch, 2018;Luk et al 2018).…”

The current state of prostate cancer treatment in Trinidad and Tobago

“…A review of the uro-oncology database of the SFGH revealed that from 2010 to 2017, 5.1%, 1.9%, 34.7%, 48.2% and 10% of men were treated with radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, hormonal therapy and active surveillance, respectively [ 13 ]. The high proportion of men being treated primarily with hormonal therapy is not surprising given the relatively high number of Trinidadian men presenting with advanced disease compared to the developed world [ 4 ].…”