Beyond Open Communication: A Call for Partnership Between Clinical Ethics and Research Ethics Committees

Cho, Hae Lin; Miller, David; Grady, Christine

doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1401171

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In creating the draft, the group adopted as a springboard the UKCEN 2010 model developed by Larcher et al (2010) (Table 1), which in turn was based on the core competencies for clinical ethics consultants reported and presented by ASBH. While remaining conscious of the various similarities and differences in purpose, function/role, and authority between HCECS and RECS (Cho et al 2018;Matsui 2016), the group first adapted the description of competencies to the context of research ethics, then repeatedly went through a process of discussing competencies within the group, making suitable revisions or modifications to necessary points, and appropriately supplementing items that appeared to be insufficient. In addition to the members of the research group, specialists in research ethics and bioethics of the Kiban-kenkyu (A) Matsui Group also participated in this process.…”

Section: Development Process and Draft Research Ethics Consultant Core Competencies Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Proposed Model of Core Competencies for Research Ethics Consultants

Matsui¹,

Inoue

Yanagawa

et al. 2021

ABR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research ethics consultation services (RECS), which function as an advisory service to facilitate the resolution of complex ethical issues in clinical research, have been proliferating over the last decade. However, the qualification of an individual who provides RECS, or “a research ethics consultant,” has not been thoroughly investigated, in contrast to healthcare ethics consultants, whose core competencies have been discussed and clarified to a great extent. In this study, we investigated core competencies necessary for research ethics consultants, referring to the core competency models of ethics consultants developed in the healthcare practice context, and propose a competency model for research ethics consultants.

show abstract

Section: Development Process and Draft Research Ethics Consultant Core Competencies Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Proposed Model of Core Competencies for Research Ethics Consultants

Matsui¹,

Inoue

Yanagawa

et al. 2021

ABR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cho et al (2018) promoted the formation of partnerships between research ethics consultation and clinical ethics consultation services. We agree.…”

Section: Partnershipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining the Scope and Improving the Quality of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Response to Open Peer Commentaries About the National Collaborative

Porter¹,

Danis

Taylor

et al. 2018

The American Journal of Bioethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Open Peer Commentaries on “The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights from a National Collaborative201D highlight the many ways in which the practice of ethics consultation for clinical research can be further advanced. We respond here to a number of key considerations highlighted by commentators, including the role and scope of research ethics consultation (REC), relationships with other institutional services and programs, efforts to ensure the quality of consultations provided, and the feasibility of widespread REC services.

show abstract