2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-017-0736-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter inhibition with volixibat in healthy adults and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundPathogenesis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) involves abnormal cholesterol metabolism and hepatic accumulation of toxic free cholesterol. Apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) inhibition in the terminal ileum may facilitate removal of free cholesterol from the liver by reducing recirculation of bile acids (BAs) to the liver, thereby stimulating new BA synthesis from cholesterol. The aim of this phase 1 study in adult healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with type 2 diabetes me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, SC-435 improved insulin sensitivity and prevented hepatic accumulation of triglyceride. More recently, a randomized placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that Volixibat, another ASBT inhibitor, increased the excretion of fecal bile acid and serum levels of 7a-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (a bile acid synthesis biomarker) in healthy adults and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [124], further supporting the mechanistic rationale for application of ASBT inhibitors to NASH treatment. Generally, research about the effect of ASBT inhibitors on NAFLD are focused on the preclinically mechanistic studies.…”
Section: Inhibitors Against Bile Acid Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, SC-435 improved insulin sensitivity and prevented hepatic accumulation of triglyceride. More recently, a randomized placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that Volixibat, another ASBT inhibitor, increased the excretion of fecal bile acid and serum levels of 7a-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (a bile acid synthesis biomarker) in healthy adults and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [124], further supporting the mechanistic rationale for application of ASBT inhibitors to NASH treatment. Generally, research about the effect of ASBT inhibitors on NAFLD are focused on the preclinically mechanistic studies.…”
Section: Inhibitors Against Bile Acid Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…All three IBAT inhibitors showed similar adverse events: dose-dependent diarrhea (up to 50, 100, and 83% with A4250, SHP626, and GSK2330672, respectively) and abdominal pain (up to 33, 78, and 17% with A4250, SHP626, and GSK2330672, respectively) ( Graffner et al, 2016 ; Ino et al, 2018 ; Tiessen et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Phase I Clinical Trials With Ibat Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…SHP626, as compared with placebo, increased mean total fecal BA excretion about ∼1.6–3.2 times in healthy volunteers and ∼8 times in patients with T2DM. With SHP626, mean C4 concentrations increased by ∼1.3–5.3-fold from baseline to day 28 in healthy volunteers and twofold in T2DM patients ( Tiessen et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Phase I Clinical Trials With Ibat Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, study data supported the anticipated effects of IBAT inhibition, that is, decreased hepatic and circulating bile acid levels accompanied by increased fecal bile acid excretion. [82][83][84][85][86] IBAT inhibitors are currently in development for a range of target indications across both paediatric (eg PFIC, ALGS and others) and adult (eg PBC, PSC, others) populations. In cholestatic liver diseases, preventing the return of bile acids to the liver via IBAT inhibition may relieve the inflammatory and fibrotic pressures driving tissue damage such that cholestasis and liver function may improve.…”
Section: Ibat Inhib Itor S In De Velopmentmentioning
confidence: 99%