Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda

Abstract

BackgroundThe Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening.MethodsThis paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams’ experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability.ResultsThe three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams’ experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams’ initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes.ConclusionsThe ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems

“…While the final set of included studies indicate the breadth of research on the African continent, there is a need to refine these criteria and appraise the quality of resulting studies in a more detailed systematic review. A potential focus for further research may be to trace KT strategies, outcomes, barriers and facilitators through specific countries to provide more contextualised theories of change [100].…”

Toward Learning from Change Pathways: Reviewing Theory of Change and Its Discontents

“…Th e first two concerns (distinguishing ToCs from other evaluation approach es and conceptual vagueness) can be addressed through clarification from the evaluation team. It is not uncommon, for example, for ToCs to resemble logic models, logical frameworks, and impact pathways, as ToCs were developed as an extension of (and in response to the limitations of) these approaches (Paina et al, 2017). Furthermore, there will likely be confusion among stakeholders, as ToC is not, in fact, a theory as is commonly understood in the social sciences.…”

Strategic Purchasing for Better Health in Armenia

“…Furthermore, the political context determines to a significant extent which health reform options are feasible. 90 Therefore, in this chapter, we review the implications of the political, macro-fiscal, and health system context in Armenia for the design and implementation of the next generation of strategic purchasing reforms ( Figure 10). Mher Grigoryan has led the development of economic packages to address the mediumto-long-term impacts of the pandemic.…”