2017
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22122179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Seed Expansion Graph Clustering Method for Protein Complexes Detection in Protein Interaction Networks

Abstract: Most proteins perform their biological functions while interacting as complexes. The detection of protein complexes is an important task not only for understanding the relationship between functions and structures of biological network, but also for predicting the function of unknown proteins. We present a new nodal metric by integrating its local topological information. The metric reflects its representability in a larger local neighborhood to a cluster of a protein interaction (PPI) network. Based on the me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the effectiveness of our proposed method, we compared it against several existing algorithms, namely HGCA (Wang et al, 2019), IPCA (Li et al, 2008), DCU (Zhao et al, 2014), and SEGC (Wang et al, 2017). In this comparative analysis, we specifically focused on methods that strive to encompass nearly 100 percent of the proteins when constructing complexes, ensuring that each node is included in at least one complex.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess the effectiveness of our proposed method, we compared it against several existing algorithms, namely HGCA (Wang et al, 2019), IPCA (Li et al, 2008), DCU (Zhao et al, 2014), and SEGC (Wang et al, 2017). In this comparative analysis, we specifically focused on methods that strive to encompass nearly 100 percent of the proteins when constructing complexes, ensuring that each node is included in at least one complex.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recursive process ensures a comprehensive expansion of the cluster, guided by the local structural properties of the protein interaction network. SEGC, introduced in (Wang et al, 2017), presents a unique approach to seed selection by employing a roulette wheel strategy, thereby enhancing the diversity of clusters. Through the evaluation of both the cluster density and the connection of a node u to cluster C, the algorithm computes the closeness measure NC(u, C), indicating the proximity of the node to the cluster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for the minimum diameter and average node distance characteristics of protein complexes, the improved DPClus algorithm (IPCA) [17] enhances DPClus through the integration of sub-graph diameters and interaction probabilities, which provide insights into the density of the network. Other methods in this category include SEGC [18], Core [19], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been various different clustering methods in the literature. In general, they can be classified into 6 categories, that is density-based (c.f., DP [8], DP-HD [9], DBSCAN [10], NQ-DBSCAN [11], CSSub [12] and GDPC [13]), grid-based (c.f., CLIQUE [14], Gridwave [15] and WaveCluster [16]), model-based (c.f., Gaussian parsimonious [17], Gaussian mixture models [18] and Latent tree models [19]), partition-ing (c.f., K-means [20,21,22], K-partitioning [23] and TLBO [24]), graph-based (SEGC [25], ProClust [26] and MCSSGC [27]), and hierarchical (c.f., BIRCH [28] and CHAMELEON [29]) approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%