2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered reward learning and hippocampal connectivity following psychosocial stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, uncontrollable auditory stimuli can elevate stress responses (Arguelles, Ibeas, Ottone, & Chekherdemian, 1962;Breier et al, 1987;Rylander, 2004;Westman & Walters, 1981) and may disrupt dopaminergic mechanisms (Arnsten et al, 1998) and cognitive functioning (Glass, Reim, & Singer, 1971). Whereas in studies using other well-validated stress manipulations, such as the cold pressor task (e.g., Byrne, Cornwall, & Worthy, 2019;Lighthall et al, 2013) or the Trier social test (e.g., Kruse, Tapia León, Stalder, Stark, & Klucken, 2018;Petzold et al, 2010), stress induction precedes task-solving (hence, learning), in our study we ensured that the stress induction occurred throughout the task, i.e. concurrently with learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, uncontrollable auditory stimuli can elevate stress responses (Arguelles, Ibeas, Ottone, & Chekherdemian, 1962;Breier et al, 1987;Rylander, 2004;Westman & Walters, 1981) and may disrupt dopaminergic mechanisms (Arnsten et al, 1998) and cognitive functioning (Glass, Reim, & Singer, 1971). Whereas in studies using other well-validated stress manipulations, such as the cold pressor task (e.g., Byrne, Cornwall, & Worthy, 2019;Lighthall et al, 2013) or the Trier social test (e.g., Kruse, Tapia León, Stalder, Stark, & Klucken, 2018;Petzold et al, 2010), stress induction precedes task-solving (hence, learning), in our study we ensured that the stress induction occurred throughout the task, i.e. concurrently with learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher in‐group variance in the sample of the present sample might have decreased the power to detect these effects more than the increased sample size increased power. Second, the previous study applied a more strict protocol, only collecting data in the afternoon to have constant baseline cortisol levels for a secondary research question (Kruse et al, ). As this is known to affect emotional learning, it is possible, that variation in involvement of vACC and caudate nucleus during early extinction is moderated by the time of day, for example, due to variation in baseline cortisol levels (Merz, Stark, Vaitl, Tabbert, & Wolf, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were not instructed about the explicit CS‐UCS contingencies. The first trials of the CS+ and the CS− were later excluded from the analyses because learning could not have taken place yet (Kruse, Tapia León, Stalder, Stark, & Klucken, ). In each trial, a CS+ or CS− (blue or yellow rectangle) was presented for 6 s, followed by a fixation cross for a variable (1–3 s) interstimulus interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations