2018
DOI: 10.1111/tri.13110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical validation of a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay-basedin vitrodiagnostic assay to monitor cytomegalovirus-specific cell-mediated immunity in kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter, longitudinal, prospective, observational study

Abstract: Impaired cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) is a major cause of CMV reactivation and associated complications in solid-organ transplantation. Reliably assessing CMV-CMI is desirable to individually adjust antiviral and immunosuppressive therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of T-Track CMV, a novel IFN-γ ELISpot assay based on the stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with pp65 and IE-I CMV proteins, to monitor CMV-CMI following kidney transplantation. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A diagnostic test of immune competency against CMV can be utilized in different scenarios: at the end of primary prophylaxis, to determine if extended prophylaxis or close VL monitoring might be of benefit [10-16, 18, 22, 25]; at the end of treatment of CMV infection, to support the need for secondary prophylaxis [6,8]; finally, in patients with asymptomatic CMV DNAemia, to determine if antiviral treatment is truly indicated [12,13,17,23,29]. Herein, the CMV-TCIP performed well in a relatively small (but comparable in size to other similar studies [8,12,29,30]) case series, including all three potential scenaria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A diagnostic test of immune competency against CMV can be utilized in different scenarios: at the end of primary prophylaxis, to determine if extended prophylaxis or close VL monitoring might be of benefit [10-16, 18, 22, 25]; at the end of treatment of CMV infection, to support the need for secondary prophylaxis [6,8]; finally, in patients with asymptomatic CMV DNAemia, to determine if antiviral treatment is truly indicated [12,13,17,23,29]. Herein, the CMV-TCIP performed well in a relatively small (but comparable in size to other similar studies [8,12,29,30]) case series, including all three potential scenaria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Quantiferon®-CMV assay can predict late-onset CMV disease after primary prophylaxis [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and spontaneous clearance of CMV DNAemia [12,13,29]; it has also been used in two interventional studies to guide primary [16] or secondary (after treatment for a CMV event) [8] prophylaxis. ELISPOT-based CMV-CMI assays (T-Track CMV® and T-SPOT®-CMV) can also help predict CMV events [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. It should be noted though that, at the time of this manuscript, these assays are limited to research use only in the US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are active clinical trials for investigating the clinical utility of IGRA for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection which measuring CMV-specific immunity in host (36). The assays to estimate the degree of adverse immunosuppression or immune activation potentially against allograft have been …”
Section: The Need Of Further Immune Monitoring Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two easy to apply assays which are commercially available for measuring the cellular response to CMV viremia but they do not directly determine the number of virus-specific T cells: QuantiFERON CMV, which is a whole blood interferon-gamma release assay based on ELISA technology [22] and T-Track CMV, which is an ELISpot assay [23]. Both assays have been used in initial diagnostic trials to determine diagnostic cutoff values [24,25]. These assays are simple to use but both have the limitation that they only give a rough estimation of T cell activation.…”
Section: Methods For Detection and Quantification Of Virus-specific Tmentioning
confidence: 99%