The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Trial to Determine Whether Wearing Short-Sleeved White Coats Reduces the Risk for Pathogen Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was likely the result of the sleeve cuffs touching the mannequin, which occurred during 44% of the observed interactions. Transmission of the cauliflower mosaic virus DNA to a second mannequin was limited and there was no significant difference between short and long-sleeved uniforms ( p > 0.05; 5% versus 0%) ( John et al, 2017 ). The rate of Micrococcus luteus transmission to mannequins during simulated physical examination was also statistically similar between short and long sleeve uniforms ( p > 0.05; zero versus one of five mannequins contaminated) ( Weber et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Survey Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was likely the result of the sleeve cuffs touching the mannequin, which occurred during 44% of the observed interactions. Transmission of the cauliflower mosaic virus DNA to a second mannequin was limited and there was no significant difference between short and long-sleeved uniforms ( p > 0.05; 5% versus 0%) ( John et al, 2017 ). The rate of Micrococcus luteus transmission to mannequins during simulated physical examination was also statistically similar between short and long sleeve uniforms ( p > 0.05; zero versus one of five mannequins contaminated) ( Weber et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Survey Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies are limited by the risk of doctors behaving differently upon being observed and the results may not reflect their usual practice. The study by John et al (2017) is also limited by the use of viral DNA rather than a viable pathogen, which may have differing transfer efficiencies between textiles and the environment. There do not appear to be any similar investigations in the published literature on transmission from other healthcare textiles, such as bed linens, which are in more intimate contact with patients for longer periods of time.…”
Section: Sattar Et Al (2001)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Recent studies show that the long-sleeves of the doctors' white coats have been shown to transfer bacteria from one patient to another, thereby serving as fomites that could transmit infectious diseases. 4,26 Again, in the systemic review conducted by Haun and colleagues found that white coats had a contamination rate of up to 16% with MRSA and up to 42% with GNR. 4 It is important to highlight, that whitecoats in some instances had higher GNR prevalence than stethoscopes that were being used to examine patients.…”
Section: Dirty White Coatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 It is important to highlight, that whitecoats in some instances had higher GNR prevalence than stethoscopes that were being used to examine patients. 4,26 John et al randomized practitioners to long and short sleeves while examining a mannequin contaminated with viral DNA followed by examination of uncontaminated mannequin. The cuffs of long sleeve white coats touched the contaminated mannequin 77% of simulations and contacted the uncontaminated mannequin 68% of the simulations Also they found significantly more transfer of viruses to clean sites when wearing long sleeve white coats (figure 2).…”
Section: Dirty White Coatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation