Abstract:The eradication rate of V-AC treatment in the CAM-susceptible H. pylori-infected patients was <90%, as was that by PPI-AC, thus V-AC is not ideal regimen in CAM-susceptible H. pylori. However, the 82.9% eradication rate of V-AC in the CAM-resistant infections may indicate the potential of V-AC with modified dose, dosing interval, and treatment duration. (UMIN000016337).
“…As stated in the 2 RCTs included in our analysis, either vonoprazan‐based or PPI‐based therapy can achieve high eradication rates in patients with clarithromycin‐susceptible strains, while in patients with clarithromycin‐resistant strains both therapies achieved lower eradication rates . These data emphasize the importance of antibiotic resistance to the failure of eradication therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Dong et al demonstrated that the odds ratio for H. pylori eradication using vonoprazan‐based therapy as compared to conventional PPI‐based therapy was greater for patients infected with clarithromycin‐resistant strains (OR: 5.92) than for patients infected with clarithromycin‐susceptible strains (OR: 2.02). Our results, based on data including that of the most recently published RCT on vonoprazan vs PPI in triple therapy for H. pylori eradication, also suggest that the efficacy of vonoprazan‐based triple therapies may be greatly affected by clarithromycin susceptibility …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…All 5 studies provided eradication rates based on clarithromycin susceptibility. However, 2 studies provided data for clarithromycin‐susceptible strains …”
Vonoprazan-based and conventional PPI-based therapies are similarly effective for the eradication of clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori strains. Vonoprazan is superior to conventional PPI-based therapy for the eradication of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains. However, clarithromycin was misused because the combination of vonoprazan and amoxicillin cures approximately 80% of infections without clarithromycin.
“…As stated in the 2 RCTs included in our analysis, either vonoprazan‐based or PPI‐based therapy can achieve high eradication rates in patients with clarithromycin‐susceptible strains, while in patients with clarithromycin‐resistant strains both therapies achieved lower eradication rates . These data emphasize the importance of antibiotic resistance to the failure of eradication therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Dong et al demonstrated that the odds ratio for H. pylori eradication using vonoprazan‐based therapy as compared to conventional PPI‐based therapy was greater for patients infected with clarithromycin‐resistant strains (OR: 5.92) than for patients infected with clarithromycin‐susceptible strains (OR: 2.02). Our results, based on data including that of the most recently published RCT on vonoprazan vs PPI in triple therapy for H. pylori eradication, also suggest that the efficacy of vonoprazan‐based triple therapies may be greatly affected by clarithromycin susceptibility …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…All 5 studies provided eradication rates based on clarithromycin susceptibility. However, 2 studies provided data for clarithromycin‐susceptible strains …”
Vonoprazan-based and conventional PPI-based therapies are similarly effective for the eradication of clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori strains. Vonoprazan is superior to conventional PPI-based therapy for the eradication of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains. However, clarithromycin was misused because the combination of vonoprazan and amoxicillin cures approximately 80% of infections without clarithromycin.
“…The H. pylori status of all participants was determined using a urea breath test (UBT), H. pylori stool antigen test, detection of anti‐ H. pylori IgG, rapid urease test, or H. pylori culture (same procedure as in our previous study) (Table ). Endoscopy was performed within 1 year in all patients.…”
The findings suggest that 7-day triple therapy with vonoprazan, amoxicillin, and sitafloxacin is more effective than proton-pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and sitafloxacin as a third-line regimen for eradicating H. pylori.
“…A large Japanese trial comparing vonoprazan vs PPI in first‐line triple therapy reported a significantly higher eradication rate with vonoprazan (90.8%) compared to esomeprazole (77.5%) or rabeprazole (68.4%) . The eradication rates of vonoprazan with amoxicillin and clarithromycin in clarithromycin‐resistant patients were 82.9% …”
Treatment options for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori continue to evolve. There have been many guidelines for H. pylori treatment published, which may lead to some confusion. However, most are in agreement with the most recent iteration of the Maastricht treatment guidelines. Triple therapy is still the most frequently used treatment, especially in areas of low clarithromycin resistance. Its best results are achieved when taken for a minimum of 10 days and with high-dose acid suppression. Quadruple therapy is gaining in popularity particularly in areas with increasing resistance to standard triple therapy. Whether three antibiotics, or bismuth and two antibiotics are used, excellent eradication rates are achieved, albeit with increased side effects. Levofloxacin second-line therapy is widely used; however bismuth, when available, is an increasingly successful option. Sequential therapy is challenging in terms of compliance and is no longer recommended. This past year witnessed a notable increase in the number of studies based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and tailored eradication therapy, reflecting the role of culture-guided treatment, which may well represent the future of H. pylori treatment and prevent the inappropriate use of antibiotics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.