How to choose the most appropriate cognitive test to evaluate cognitive complaints in primary care

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the wealth of research devoted to the performance of individual cognitive tests for diagnosing cognitive impairment (including mild cognitive impairment and dementia), it can be difficult for general practitioners to choose the most appropriate test for a patient with cognitive complaints in daily practice.In this paper we present a diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of cognitive complaints in primary care. The rationale behind this algorithm is that the likelihood of cognitive impairment -which can be determined after history taking and an informant interview- should determine which cognitive test is most suitable.MethodsWe distinguished three likelihoods of cognitive impairment: not likely, possible or likely. We selected cognitive tests based on pre-defined required test features for each of these three situations and a review of the literature. We incorporated the cognitive tests in a practical diagnostic algorithm.ResultsBased on the available literature, in patients with complaints but where cognitive impairment is considered to be unlikely the clock-drawing test can be used to rule out cognitive impairment. When cognitive impairment is possible the Montreal cognitive assessment can be used to rule out cognitive impairment or to make cognitive impairment more likely. When cognitive impairment is likely the Mini-Mental State Examination can be used to confirm the presence of cognitive impairment.ConclusionsWe propose a diagnostic algorithm to increase the efficiency of ruling out or diagnosing cognitive impairment in primary care. Further study is needed to validate and evaluate this stepwise diagnostic algorithm.

Inequalities in Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults in China and the Associated Social Determinants: A Decomposition Approach

“…The reason for the insigni cance may lie in the confounding caused by the criterion of outcome variable related to education level. Since the sensitivity of MMSE scores to mild cognitive impairment is relatively low [33,38], there may be some overlap between groups with different MMSE scores [11]. As indicated in previous research, MMSE in the CLHLS may weaken the impact of education [4].…”

Souvenaid in the management of mild cognitive impairment: an expert consensus opinion

“…The success of the strategies to delay the progression of MCI to dementia depends on early and accurate identification of people at risk of AD, including those without any evidence of significant neurodegeneration [20]. Appropriate assessment by the primary care physician including screening for cognitive problems is important to expedite referral of individuals with suspected MCI to specialists, e.g., geriatricians, psychiatrists, or neurologists [21, 22]; however, many patients are not referred [23] and some healthcare organizations may even discourage the use of specialists [24]. Timely referral and diagnosis of MCI can motivate individuals to adhere to potentially beneficial lifestyle changes and treatment interventions [11].…”

Clinical value of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients suspected of cognitive impairment in old age psychiatry. Using the MoCA for triaging to a memory clinic

“…According to the Cochrane review, "the MoCA may help identify people requiring specialist assessment and treatment for dementia" (Davis et al, 2015, p. 5). General practitioners in the Netherlands are advised to use the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) especially for patients with "possible CI" but less so for "not likely" or "likely" CI patients (Janssen et al, 2017). Screening older patients with the MoCA is often recommended as subjective cognitive complaints agree poorly with objective cognitive deficit (Pendlebury et al, 2015) but results in too many false positives in old age psychiatry (Dautzenberg et al, 2020).…”