When not to perform isolated tricuspid valve surgery? Our long-term experience in tricuspid valve replacement in highly symptomatic patients

Redondo, Ana; Menéndez, José López; Hycka, Javier Miguelena; Varela, Laura

doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx444

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The persistence of rheumatic fever is still present in some patients with previous left-sided valve surgeries following the rheumatic valvular lesion, which may result in organic TV dysfunction. [13][14][15] In our study, the majority of the cause for the previous valve surgery was rheumatic heart disease (88.9%). There were 20-30 cases with isolated repeated TV repair in about 700 involved TV surgeries per year in our institute.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modified unicaval drainage in reoperative isolated tricuspid valve repair via totally thoracoscopic approach

Zhou

et al. 2020

Perfusion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and clinical effect of modified unicaval drainage for thoracoscopic reoperative isolated tricuspid valve repair, compared with conventional bicaval drainage. Methods: A total of 45 consecutive cases of patients who underwent thoracoscopic reoperative isolated tricuspid valve repair on beating-heart were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the different venous drainage (Group A: modified unicaval drainage, Group B: conventional bicaval drainage). A retrospective analysis of perioperative data and clinical outcomes were performed and all the surviving cases were followed up. Re-evaluation of echocardiography and electrocardiogram was performed prior to discharge, and at first month, sixth month, and every year follow-up. Results: The overall postoperative 30-day mortality was 4.5% in Group A and 8.7% in Group B. The postoperative tricuspid valve regurgitation grade of both groups decreased significantly from preoperative regurgitation grade, p < 0.001, without intergroup significant difference, p = 0.815. Follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 38 months, there was one death at 24 months in Group A, and another at 9 months in Group B, respectively. Nobody from both groups experienced reintervention for residual tricuspid regurgitation. No significant difference could be identified about the incidence of postoperative morbidities and follow-up adverse events. Conclusion: Both strategies of caval venous drainage can provide satisfactory exposure for thoracoscopic reoperative isolated tricuspid valve repair and equivalent favorable postoperative outcome. And the modified unicaval drainage group may even preserve the anesthetic time and decrease the risk of iatrogenic jugular injury, achieving a more simplified procedure with better cosmetic outcome.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%