2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periconception Exposure to Air Pollution and Risk of Congenital Malformations

Abstract: Increased exposure to PM in the periconception period is associated with some modest risk increases for congenital malformations. The most susceptible time of exposure appears to be the 1 month before and after conception. Although the increased risk with PM exposure is modest, the potential impact on a population basis is noteworthy because all pregnant women have some degree of exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within certain populations (e.g., undocumented individuals), residential data may be incorrect. These weaknesses, however, are inherent in all retrospective studies relying on residential data [11,49,55,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. Finally, this report does not address the mechanism of action of the HMHAPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within certain populations (e.g., undocumented individuals), residential data may be incorrect. These weaknesses, however, are inherent in all retrospective studies relying on residential data [11,49,55,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. Finally, this report does not address the mechanism of action of the HMHAPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As the birth prevalence of hypospadias increases across the world [4,5,6,7,8,9,10], research into the association between pollutant exposure and hypospadias has defined a critical exposure period as the early first trimester of pregnancy [11]. Pollutants which interfere with MET during genitourinary development or hormonal cascades may play a role in hypospadias etiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although levels are decreasing, they remain high enough that we continue to discover associations between relatively low exposure and human health. Exposure to air pollution has been linked to a host of health conditions including adverse pregnancy outcomes such as pre-eclampsia (Olsson et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2009), gestational hypertension (Van Den Hooven et al, 2011;Vinikoor-Imler et al, 2012), infant death (Defranco et al, 2015;Glinianaia et al, 2004), low birth weight (Dadvand et al, 2013), infant congenital malformations (Ren et al, 2017), preterm birth (Defranco et al, 2016), and infants born small-for-gestational-age (SGA) (Hyder et al, 2014;Parker et al, 2005). A joint consensus statement by the International Societies of Pediatric Endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society discusses the negative outcomes which babies born SGA face over their lifespans including decreased growth, cognitive impairment, endocrine abnormalities, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease (Clayton et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several recent studies have shown the need to study exposures accurately over short periods and specific exposure windows [56]. Ren et al (2017). have recently shown for PM (whose behaviour in the atmosphere is similar to dioxins in particulate form) that exposure, one month before and after pregnancy increases the risk of birth defects [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ren et al (2017). have recently shown for PM (whose behaviour in the atmosphere is similar to dioxins in particulate form) that exposure, one month before and after pregnancy increases the risk of birth defects [57]. In addition to long-term exposure assessment, this GIS indicator, thanks to the finesse of the meteorological information collected, is able to estimate exposure at a daily temporal scale over the entire French territory between 1990 and 2008 and thus minimizes potential classification bias of future epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%