Slide Esophagoplasty vs End-to-End Anastomosis for Recalcitrant Esophageal Stricture after Esophageal Atresia Repair

Kamran, Ali; Smithers, C. Jason; Manfredi, Michael A.; Hamilton, Thomas E.; Ngo, Peter; Zurakowski, David; Jennings, Russell W.

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.020

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In theory, stents provide the ability to continuously apply dilation forces to the esophagus over a prolonged period of time with the goal of avoiding repeat procedures for frequent intermittent dilations. However, the success of esophageal stents to treat strictures has varied in the literature (11–13). To date, there is no clear way to predict successful stent therapy in esophageal strictures.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictors and Outcomes of Fully Covered Stent Treatment for Anastomotic Esophageal Strictures in Esophageal Atresia

Baghdadi

Yasuda²,

Staffa

et al. 2021

J. pediatr. gastroenterol. nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: Anastomotic strictures following surgical repair is one of the most common complications in esophageal atresia (EA). The utility of esophageal stenting to treat anastomotic esophageal strictures in pediatrics is unclear. Our primary aim was to evaluate whether esophageal stenting, in conjunction with dilation and other endoscopic therapies, prevented surgical stricture resection (SR). Our secondary aims were to evaluate predictors of successful esophageal stenting and evaluate adverse events from stent placement. Methods: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with EA complicated by esophageal strictures was performed. The change in stricture diameter in millimeters from the time of stent removal to subsequent endoscopy was defined as delta diameter (DD). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the discriminatory ability of DD. Youden J index was used to identify optimal cutoff-point in predicting stent success. A univariate and multivariate analysis were done to assess predictors of success. Result: Forty-nine esophageal anastomoses were stented to treat esophageal strictures. Stents prevented SR in 41% of patients. ROC curve analysis utilizing Youden J index identified DD of 4 mm (area under the curve ¼ 0.790; 95% confidence interval: 0.655-0.924; P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff point in differentiating stent success. The most common adverse events were erosions/ulcerations, granulation tissue formation, and vomiting/retching. Conclusion: Stent therapy in preventing SR at the site of EA repair was successful in 41% in our population with good long term follow-up. The most significant predictor of success in this study was the change in luminal diameter ( 4 mm) at initial poststent follow-up.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%