Towards healthy learning climates in postgraduate medical education: exploring the role of hospital-wide education committees

Abstract

BackgroundPostgraduate medical education prepares residents for delivery of high quality patient care during training as well as for later practice, which makes high quality residency training programs crucial to safeguard patient care. Healthy learning climates contribute to high quality postgraduate medical education. In several countries, modernization of postgraduate medical education has resulted in hospital-wide responsibilities for monitoring learning climates. This study investigates the association between the actions undertaken by hospital-wide education committees and learning climates in postgraduate medical education.MethodsResearch conducted in December 2010 invited 57 chairs of hospital-wide education committees to complete a questionnaire on their implemented level of quality improvement policies. We merged the survey data from 21 committees that oversaw training programs and used the Dutch Residency Educational Climate Test (D-RECT) instrument in 2012 to measure their training programs’ learning climate. We used descriptive statistics and linear mixed models to analyse associations between the functioning of hospital-wide education committees and corresponding learning climates.ResultsIn total, 812 resident evaluations for 99 training programs in 21 teaching hospitals were available for analysis. The implementation level of the internal quality management systems as adopted by the hospital-wide education committees varied from 1.6 to 2.6 on a 5 point Likert-scale (ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best)). No significant associations were found between the functioning of the committees and corresponding learning climates.ConclusionsThe contribution of hospital-wide committees to creating healthy learning climates is yet to be demonstrated. The absence of such an association could be due to the lack of a Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle guiding the policy as implemented by the committees and the lack of involvement of departmental leadership. Insight into the impact of these strategies on learning climates will benefit the quality of postgraduate medical education and, hopefully, patient care.

Moderating Role of Peer Pressure and Positive Learning Environment Between Career Calling and Academic Procrastination in Chinese Medical Students During Controlled COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…This survey corroborated findings that a positive learning environment can moderate the degree of impact between career calling and academic procrastination. Milou 59 mentioned that a harmonious learning environment contributes to high-quality medical education, a finding that was confirmed in this study.…”

“…This theory states that people affected by the environment may engage in behaviors they would not otherwise participate in. 59 It could be interpreted that students’ decisions are influenced by the groups’ typical responses. 60 According to this theory, students would spend more time studying than usual when the learning environment encourages such behavior.…”

How postgraduate trainees from different health professions experience the learning climate within an operating theater: a mixed-methods study

“…The influence of the learning climate on outcomes of post-graduate medical education has been widely recognized [5, 9]. By evaluating the learning climate, we can get insights in how to improve student learning but also how to (re)design the learning environment and support faculty in their teaching role [21].…”

“…Studies have revealed that a positive learning climate is a key factor for effective learning in different models of clinical, workplace based learning [3, 4]. Furthermore, the learning climate as experienced in postgraduate training programs has been linked to learning and clinical outcomes [5–7] as well as trainees’ long-term practice patterns in terms of quality and safety of patient care [8, 9]. In order to evaluate and improve the learning climate, valid and reliable instruments are needed [10].…”

An Analysis of the Educational Environment at the Malta Foundation Programme Using the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM)

“…35 A healthy learning environment has been associated with better residents' outcomes including satisfaction with training, the use of knowledge, and a professional identity development. 36,37 The importance of having a high-quality clinical learning environment stems from the knowledge that a high-quality learning environment will have a direct impact on workplace learning and, on the quality, and safety of the clinical care received by patients. Trainees exposed to a high-quality clinical learning environment will have been exposed to participation in the clinical care of patients in a supervised manner.…”