Abstract:The neuropsychological aspects of multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved over the past three decades. What was once thought to be a rare occurrence, cognitive dysfunction is now viewed as one of the most disabling symptoms of the disease, with devastating effects on patients' quality of life. This selective review will highlight major innovations and scientific discoveries in the areas of neuropathology, neuroimaging, diagnosis, and treatment that pertain to our understanding of the neuropsychological aspects of… Show more
“…Cognitive dysfunction (CD) has been reported to occur in 40-70% of MS patients. [1][2][3][4][5] CD may be seen at early disease stages and is not directly related to EDSS scores, yet tends to be more severe in progressive patients and to increase with disease duration. Even in mild CD, psychosocial, professional and daily functioning may be affected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in mild CD, psychosocial, professional and daily functioning may be affected. [3][4][5][6][7] MS-related CD may involve any of the six core functional domains: perceptual-motor function, language, learning and memory, executive function, complex attention and social cognition and emotion regulation. [1][2][3]5,[8][9][10] Sub-types may co-exist, and CD often interacts with physical and affective MS symptoms such as stress, depression, fatigue or pain, hampering a clear establishment of causalities and confounders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,5,8,[11][12][13][14][15] CD in MS is thus a complex research field and much is still unclear with respect to both the primary and secondary causes of CD, and the ability of coping and cognitive reserve to mitigate the impact of brain atrophy. [1][2][3][4][5]7,11,12,16,17 Various neuropsychological tests have been developed to assess different domains of cognitive functioning. 1,[3][4][5]7,[17][18][19] Composite testing using multidimensional outcome measures improves the chances of identifying all relevant deficits, but they are challenging to apply in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5]7,11,12,16,17 Various neuropsychological tests have been developed to assess different domains of cognitive functioning. 1,[3][4][5]7,[17][18][19] Composite testing using multidimensional outcome measures improves the chances of identifying all relevant deficits, but they are challenging to apply in clinical practice. 7,17,19 The brief Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is recommended in terms of its sensitivity and clinical applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tablet-based testing will enable electronic transfer of data to patient records allowing to monitor changes over time. 1,4,[19][20][21] Consensus is lacking about when changing CD scores are clinically relevant and may lead to switch in treatment. 1 It is considered likely that disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) have positive effects through the general reduction in disease activity.…”
Background and Aim: In recent years, cognitive dysfunction (CD) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has received increased attention. Neuropsychological tests have been developed allowing to monitor changes in patients' cognitive functions. Knowledge is lacking, however, about patients' attitudes towards introducing routine cognitive testing. It was the aim of this qualitative study to explore this. Materials and Methods: Based on a literature study, semi-structured interview guides were designed and used in qualitative interviews with 12 Danish patients. Participants were selected to represent different perspectives on CD and included patients with relapsingremitting MS (RRMS) and secondary-progressive MS (SPMS), women and men with varying time since diagnosis and cognitive test scores using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). The data were analysed using a constructivist approach in order to identify significant relations between the quality of life (QoL) impact of CD, and attitudes towards routine cognitive testing. Results: Most participants reported several subtypes of CD, yet objective CD did not coincide with subjective CD nor did it translate directly into poorer QoL. Overall, CD appeared to have larger impact on the QoL of patients with RRMS and higher SDMT scores, compared to patients with SPMS and lower SDMT scores. The QoL impact of CD manifested itself in the encounter between individual symptoms, expectations, coping and meaningful activities. All patients supported an introduction of routine cognitive testing, but patients with RRMS and SPMS had different main reasons to do so. These were related to supporting research, optimising treatment decisions, and providing documentation of this invisible MS symptom. Conclusion: All aspects of MS patients' QoL may be affected by CD. Introducing routine cognitive testing was widely supported by patients in all phases of MS calling for comprehensive care taking both physical and cognitive difficulties into account.
“…Cognitive dysfunction (CD) has been reported to occur in 40-70% of MS patients. [1][2][3][4][5] CD may be seen at early disease stages and is not directly related to EDSS scores, yet tends to be more severe in progressive patients and to increase with disease duration. Even in mild CD, psychosocial, professional and daily functioning may be affected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in mild CD, psychosocial, professional and daily functioning may be affected. [3][4][5][6][7] MS-related CD may involve any of the six core functional domains: perceptual-motor function, language, learning and memory, executive function, complex attention and social cognition and emotion regulation. [1][2][3]5,[8][9][10] Sub-types may co-exist, and CD often interacts with physical and affective MS symptoms such as stress, depression, fatigue or pain, hampering a clear establishment of causalities and confounders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,5,8,[11][12][13][14][15] CD in MS is thus a complex research field and much is still unclear with respect to both the primary and secondary causes of CD, and the ability of coping and cognitive reserve to mitigate the impact of brain atrophy. [1][2][3][4][5]7,11,12,16,17 Various neuropsychological tests have been developed to assess different domains of cognitive functioning. 1,[3][4][5]7,[17][18][19] Composite testing using multidimensional outcome measures improves the chances of identifying all relevant deficits, but they are challenging to apply in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5]7,11,12,16,17 Various neuropsychological tests have been developed to assess different domains of cognitive functioning. 1,[3][4][5]7,[17][18][19] Composite testing using multidimensional outcome measures improves the chances of identifying all relevant deficits, but they are challenging to apply in clinical practice. 7,17,19 The brief Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is recommended in terms of its sensitivity and clinical applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tablet-based testing will enable electronic transfer of data to patient records allowing to monitor changes over time. 1,4,[19][20][21] Consensus is lacking about when changing CD scores are clinically relevant and may lead to switch in treatment. 1 It is considered likely that disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) have positive effects through the general reduction in disease activity.…”
Background and Aim: In recent years, cognitive dysfunction (CD) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has received increased attention. Neuropsychological tests have been developed allowing to monitor changes in patients' cognitive functions. Knowledge is lacking, however, about patients' attitudes towards introducing routine cognitive testing. It was the aim of this qualitative study to explore this. Materials and Methods: Based on a literature study, semi-structured interview guides were designed and used in qualitative interviews with 12 Danish patients. Participants were selected to represent different perspectives on CD and included patients with relapsingremitting MS (RRMS) and secondary-progressive MS (SPMS), women and men with varying time since diagnosis and cognitive test scores using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). The data were analysed using a constructivist approach in order to identify significant relations between the quality of life (QoL) impact of CD, and attitudes towards routine cognitive testing. Results: Most participants reported several subtypes of CD, yet objective CD did not coincide with subjective CD nor did it translate directly into poorer QoL. Overall, CD appeared to have larger impact on the QoL of patients with RRMS and higher SDMT scores, compared to patients with SPMS and lower SDMT scores. The QoL impact of CD manifested itself in the encounter between individual symptoms, expectations, coping and meaningful activities. All patients supported an introduction of routine cognitive testing, but patients with RRMS and SPMS had different main reasons to do so. These were related to supporting research, optimising treatment decisions, and providing documentation of this invisible MS symptom. Conclusion: All aspects of MS patients' QoL may be affected by CD. Introducing routine cognitive testing was widely supported by patients in all phases of MS calling for comprehensive care taking both physical and cognitive difficulties into account.
BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological condition that necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to aid those living with MS in managing their disease. Health behavior, or lifestyle modification, is an emerging approach to MS self‐management. MS researchers utilize measurement tools to ensure that interventions are best suited to the outcomes, thereby potentially influencing practice. The aim of this study was to investigate which tools are being used for health behavior management studies in people living with MS and develop an aid for tool selection.MethodsA scoping review guided by the PRISMA‐Sc checklist and the JBI manual for evidence synthesis was employed with a systematic search strategy executed across four scientific databases: Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Libraries. The types of assessment tools used were extracted from the included studies. Each tool was categorized into the health behavior intervention discipline (nutrition, exercise, and psychology) and then subcategorized by the tool's purpose. The frequency of use was determined for each tool. Reporting of validation of the assessment tools were collated to inform a tool selection checklist.ResultsThe review identified a total of 248 tools (12 nutrition, 55 exercise, and 119 psychology unique reports) from 166 studies. Seventy‐seven multidimensional tools were identified including measures of quality of life, fatigue, and functional scales. Only 88 studies (53%) referred to the validity of the tools. The most commonly reported tools were the dietary habits questionnaire (n = 4, nutrition), 6‐minute walk test (n = 17, exercise), Symbol Digits and Modalities Test, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (n = 15 each, psychology) with the Expanded Disability Status Scale reported 43 times.ConclusionEvidence from interventions may inform practice for health professionals. This review provides insights into the range of tools reported across health behavior intervention studies for MS and offers a guide toward more consistent reporting of study methods.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.