2017
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Planteome database: an integrated resource for reference ontologies, plant genomics and phenomics

Abstract: The Planteome project (http://www.planteome.org) provides a suite of reference and species-specific ontologies for plants and annotations to genes and phenotypes. Ontologies serve as common standards for semantic integration of a large and growing corpus of plant genomics, phenomics and genetics data. The reference ontologies include the Plant Ontology, Plant Trait Ontology and the Plant Experimental Conditions Ontology developed by the Planteome project, along with the Gene Ontology, Chemical Entities of Biol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
142
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontologies for subsets of experimental procedures, such as the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI), Biological Imaging Methods Ontology (FBbi), Measurement Method Ontology (MMO), and Chemical Methods Ontology, cover specimen preparation for microscopy, clinical, or biochemical analyses [2,13,14,16]. Similarly, ontologies for plant phenotypes (Phenotype and Trait Ontology (PATO), Plant Trait Ontology (TO), Plant Phenology Ontology (PPO), and Cotton Trait Ontology), genes and genomics (Planteome, reference 4), plant morphology (Plant Ontology (PO)), and agronomy (Agronomy Ontology (AGRO)) cover only portions of Chloe or are specialized for particular species [4,5,7]. Building a new ontology coordinated with these is a much more complicated task than simply generating metadata and must be community-driven to be genuinely useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ontologies for subsets of experimental procedures, such as the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI), Biological Imaging Methods Ontology (FBbi), Measurement Method Ontology (MMO), and Chemical Methods Ontology, cover specimen preparation for microscopy, clinical, or biochemical analyses [2,13,14,16]. Similarly, ontologies for plant phenotypes (Phenotype and Trait Ontology (PATO), Plant Trait Ontology (TO), Plant Phenology Ontology (PPO), and Cotton Trait Ontology), genes and genomics (Planteome, reference 4), plant morphology (Plant Ontology (PO)), and agronomy (Agronomy Ontology (AGRO)) cover only portions of Chloe or are specialized for particular species [4,5,7]. Building a new ontology coordinated with these is a much more complicated task than simply generating metadata and must be community-driven to be genuinely useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am favoring geek vernacular here over more precise computational jargon: in Prolog, facts are a particular type of rule; the most general term is predicate 4. A common example of extension is the annotation of genes by the Gene Ontology[1,6]: the annotation is individual to each gene because we don't yet know the classification rules with sufficient accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Smart layer allows data to be interpretable for other communities by referring to external resources such as standardized semantic resources and reference or species-specific ontologies as described in the Planteome project (Cooper et al, 2018). References are managed using the Simple Knowledge Organization System (Miles & Bechhofer, 2009) that allows support of standardized and advanced queries by using ontologies.…”
Section: Smart Layer Scientific Computation and Workflow Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, typical candidate approaches, in which genes underlying a QTL region are investigated manually, could be extended by selecting candidate genes, based on their phenotypes and/or based on where in a phenotype network they reside. Indeed, the Planteome project tries to assess and integrate some of these data already with clever use of biomedical ontologies (Cooper et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%