2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0666-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening

Abstract: BackgroundRecent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms administered prior to a primary care visit is a strategy to identify high risk, asymptomatic patients eligible for LDCT screening. The objective of this study was to compare the acceptability and feasibility of using brief electron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This descriptive qualitative study (11) was one of five components of a health technology assessment on LDCT screening in Ontario, Canada (Principal Investigator: L Paszat)). The other components were 1) modelling benefits, risks, and cost effectiveness (12), 2) a feasibility study of an electronic pre-screening form in primary care (13), 3) a qualitative study of the views of both individuals who were long-time smokers and PCPs, and 4) the creation of a risk assessment tool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This descriptive qualitative study (11) was one of five components of a health technology assessment on LDCT screening in Ontario, Canada (Principal Investigator: L Paszat)). The other components were 1) modelling benefits, risks, and cost effectiveness (12), 2) a feasibility study of an electronic pre-screening form in primary care (13), 3) a qualitative study of the views of both individuals who were long-time smokers and PCPs, and 4) the creation of a risk assessment tool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 371 counselees +++ Breast cancer genetic counseling clinic Netherlands Breast cancer Patient education Demographic data, Patient awareness Patient satisfaction, Medication and treatment adherence, Illness perceptions, and knowledge 15 34 Frost, J. et al [ 31 ] 2019 BMJ Open Electronic pre-office visit checklist To explore the impact of a pre-consultation website in addressing patients’ unmet needs during chronic disease consultations. 120 patients and 15 diabetologists +++ Diabetes clinics UK Diabetes Decision aid tools, Pre-assessment tools, Patient education Demographic data, Medical history, Lifestyle, Family history, Lab data, Reason for referral, Drug side effects Symptoms, Medication Appointment intake information, Visit length 17 35 O’Brien, M et al [ 32 ] 2017 BMC Fam Pract Electronic pre-office visit checklist To investigate people’s attitude towards providing symptom information electronically before a consultation. 831 patients + Family physician’s clinic Canada Lung cancer Decision aid tools, Pre-assessment tools, Patient education Demographic data, Medical history, Lifestyle, Family history, Lab data, Reason for referral, Drug side effects Symptoms, Medication Illness perceptions, Patient expectations in consultations, Appointment intake information, Medication and treatment adherence, Mental health topics 20 36 Wald, J. S. et al [ 43 ] 2009 AMIA Annu Symp Proc EHR-linked care program To investigate the potential of e-journal to improve patient care during a visit 126 patients and 230 primary care providers +++ Primary care USA Diabetes Decision aid tools, Pre-assessment tools, Patient education, Reminders Demographic data, Medical history, Lifestyle, Family history, Lab data, Reason for referral, Drug side effects Symptoms, Medication Appointment intake information, Self-care, Symptom control, Visit length, 16 37 Albertson, G. et al [ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational and organizational efforts that have targeted physicians regarding shared decision-making with their patients for LDCT screening have had some preliminary success in modifying physician knowledge, attitudes, and screening behavior. These approaches have included a digital awareness campaign ( Jessup et al, 2018 ), electronic eligibility form for patients ( O’Brien et al, 2017 ), lectures and group-based learning ( Ortmeyer et al, 2020 ), and a decision aid ( McDonnell et al, 2018 ). Due to the lack of evidence regarding effectiveness of certain screening tests such as PSA, physicians should thoroughly discuss with patients the individual benefits versus the overall risks of screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%