2017
DOI: 10.1111/tct.12737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gap for future clinician‐educators

Abstract: Our findings suggest that a clinician-educator training pathway that draws from multiple subspecialties has the potential to improve recruitment, provide needed career counselling and skills development to trainees, and to build a community of educators that will benefit the institution. Important insights from pilot participant interviews will inform the programme design, in order to keep trainees engaged and overcome logistical challenges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Recently there has been the advent of medical education tracks within graduate medical education across specialties (Psychiatry, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Internal Medicine Fellowships). [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] A 2019 scoping review looking at these medical education tracks found that most included core curricula with classroom-based sessions and workplace-based opportunities to practice skills, and required scholarly projects. 15 Outcomes data published regarding these programs are sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Recently there has been the advent of medical education tracks within graduate medical education across specialties (Psychiatry, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Internal Medicine Fellowships). [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] A 2019 scoping review looking at these medical education tracks found that most included core curricula with classroom-based sessions and workplace-based opportunities to practice skills, and required scholarly projects. 15 Outcomes data published regarding these programs are sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%