2017
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-10182017000400333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de la técnica Xpert® MTB/RIF para la detección de Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex en muestras extra-pulmonares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded one other article that reported on the specificity only [33], without reporting any sensitivity. We excluded five articles written in languages other than Chinese or English [34][35][36][37][38]. The specimens used in the article were pericardial effusion, pericardial tissue, or both.…”
Section: Identification Of Studies and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded one other article that reported on the specificity only [33], without reporting any sensitivity. We excluded five articles written in languages other than Chinese or English [34][35][36][37][38]. The specimens used in the article were pericardial effusion, pericardial tissue, or both.…”
Section: Identification Of Studies and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 , 29 The accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in TBP diagnosis in pericardial effusions is moderate, and it can be recommended as a method for rapid TBP diagnosis. 30 In pericardial tissues, NAATs are still indicated. 16 The tests currently used for TBP diagnosis are DNA-based tests, 29 and there have been no studies on the role of RNA-based tests in TBP diagnosis, which is the purpose of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nela mostrou-se que a sensibilidade do teste genotípico variou de acordo com o tipo de amostra, porém a especificidade relatada foi sempre acima de 98,0% (World Health Organization, 2013). Um grupo de autores verificou em 2017 que de um total de 50 amostras de origem extrapulmonar, houve 100,0% de concordância de positividade entre o Xpert ® MTB/RIF e a cultura líquida quanto a positividade e 96,0% de concordância quanto a negatividade (García et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified