2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enlarged perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia are independently associated with intracranial atherosclerosis in the elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems unlikely that the development of BG-EPVS causes MCA atherosclerosis, but the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unclear. One possible explanation for the association of BG-EVPS and atherosclerosis might be cerebral hypoperfusion (8,29). Our findings are supported by a previous study that showed hemodynamically compromised hemispheres tend to demonstrate a higher number of EPVS (31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It seems unlikely that the development of BG-EPVS causes MCA atherosclerosis, but the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unclear. One possible explanation for the association of BG-EVPS and atherosclerosis might be cerebral hypoperfusion (8,29). Our findings are supported by a previous study that showed hemodynamically compromised hemispheres tend to demonstrate a higher number of EPVS (31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To the best of our knowledge, our present study is the first to focus on the association between MCA atherosclerosis and BG-EPVS in a Chinese population. Although we cannot directly compare our data with those from others, previous studies addressing the relationship between BG-EPVS and carotid atherosclerosis (8,29,30) may provide important evidence to support our findings. It seems unlikely that the development of BG-EPVS causes MCA atherosclerosis, but the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations