2017
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter valve-in-valve overexpansion for treating a large dysfunctional tricuspid bioprosthesis

Abstract: Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation within dysfunctional surgical bioprosthesis has become an alternative to redo open-heart surgery. However, suitability for valve-in-valve implantation in the tricuspid position is often limited by large surgical valve sizes. We report a case of a transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation with a 29-mm balloon-expandable prosthesis within a 33-mm failed bioprosthesis (exceeding manufacturer's sizing recommendations). Overexpansion of a 29-mm SAPIEN XT valve by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of type of prosthetic valve is another important issue, so that the availability of transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement can change the trade-offs between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves [3]. Tricuspid valve-in-valve procedure was shown to be technically feasible in a number of studies in patients with a wide range of valve size [13,28]. This will be more interesting when we consider the relatively short average time to thrombosis and a high recurrence rate in our study together with the data derived from former studies indicating mean reoperation time of 44.2 months for mechanical prosthesis [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of type of prosthetic valve is another important issue, so that the availability of transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement can change the trade-offs between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves [3]. Tricuspid valve-in-valve procedure was shown to be technically feasible in a number of studies in patients with a wide range of valve size [13,28]. This will be more interesting when we consider the relatively short average time to thrombosis and a high recurrence rate in our study together with the data derived from former studies indicating mean reoperation time of 44.2 months for mechanical prosthesis [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,28 This will be more interesting when we consider the relatively short average time to thrombosis and a high recurrence rate in our study together with the data derived from former studies indicating a mean reoperation time of 44.2 months for mechanical prosthesis. 29…”
Section: Recurrent Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 99%