2017
DOI: 10.1111/avj.12638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated serum creatinine and hyponatraemia as prognostic factors in canine acute pancreatitis

Abstract: In dogs with AP, hyponatraemia and azotaemia seem to be significantly associated with an increased risk of death.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(8 reference statements)
6
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of increased creatinine as a prognostic factor in dogs with AP is in agreement with previous published studies in veterinary literature as well as in human literature . Acute kidney injury is a complication described in dogs with AP .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Identification of increased creatinine as a prognostic factor in dogs with AP is in agreement with previous published studies in veterinary literature as well as in human literature . Acute kidney injury is a complication described in dogs with AP .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Azotaemia has been a constant negative prognostic marker in several recent studies of AP in dogs and cats 22 35. AP and AKI have a two-way relationship, as the former can be the cause of the latter, and vice versa 18 36. Furthermore, herein, AKI was significantly associated with death, in corroboration with recent findings 18.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our study has identified elevated creatinine level could be as the prognostic factor for canine pancreatitis at initial presentation when the patients were first visiting between survival and non-survival groups. The result of creatinine level in this study was similar as previous published study (Marchetti et al, 2017;Sato et al, 2017). However, there were different findings of prognostic factors compared to previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%