2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06452-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendation for incorporation of a different lymph node scoring system in future AJCC N category for oral cancer

Abstract: To compare the prognostic value of 3 different lymph node scoring systems “ log odds of positive nodes (LODDS), lymph node ratio (rN), and lymph node yield “ in an effort to improve the staging of oral cancer. We identified 3958 oral cancer patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2007 to 2013. In univariate analysis, LODDS, pN, rN, and lymph node yield were prognostic factors for 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis indicated th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the lymph node ratio (LNR) that is the ratio of PLNs to RLNs, and log of odds between PLNs and the number of negative lymph node (LODDS) have emerged as alternative predictive factors for outcomes and showed superiority to lymph node status-based assessment in pancreatic cancer 10 , 11 , oral cancer 12 , 13 , non-small cell lung cancer 13 ,colorectal cancer 14 , ovarian cancer 15 , breast cancer 16 . LNR was also studied in ovarian cancer and found to be superior to both PLN and RLN in predicting survival 17 , 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the lymph node ratio (LNR) that is the ratio of PLNs to RLNs, and log of odds between PLNs and the number of negative lymph node (LODDS) have emerged as alternative predictive factors for outcomes and showed superiority to lymph node status-based assessment in pancreatic cancer 10 , 11 , oral cancer 12 , 13 , non-small cell lung cancer 13 ,colorectal cancer 14 , ovarian cancer 15 , breast cancer 16 . LNR was also studied in ovarian cancer and found to be superior to both PLN and RLN in predicting survival 17 , 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 One explanation for these different results may be that inadequate LN harvests could lead to stage migration and subsequent underestimation of disease severity, especially in those with pN1disease. 5 To our knowledge, our study is the rst to evaluate the bene t of postoperative radiotherapy by quality of neck dissection in patients with pN1 involvement and no risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Cervical positive LNs, those most commonly related to recurrence, are recognized as among the most important prognostic factors in head and neck cancer. 5 Recent studies have con rmed that the number of evaluated LNs correlates with outcomes. 6,7 Ebrahimi et al reported that an LN yield < 18 was associated with worse 5-year overall (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; 95% con dence interval [CI], 1.1-3.6), disease-speci c (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.5), and disease-free survival (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical positive LNs, those most commonly related to recurrence, are recognized as among the most important prognostic factors in head and neck cancer [ 6 ]. Recent studies have confirmed that the number of evaluated LNs correlates with outcomes [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%