2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging knowledge, policies and practices across the ageing and disability fields: a protocol for a scoping review to inform the development of a taxonomy

Abstract: IntroductionBridging is a term used to describe activities, or tasks, used to promote collaboration and knowledge exchange across fields. This paper reports the protocol for a scoping review which aims to identify and characterise peer reviewed evidence describing bridging activities, between the ageing and disability fields. The purpose is to clarify the concepts underpinning bridging to inform the development of a taxonomy, and identify research strengths and gaps.MethodsA scoping review will be conducted. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mapping also enabled separation of the tasks themselves, from inputs driving these actions, and the outcomes that result. The matrices published in this paper could potentially be used to a) generate research questions (e.g., evaluating the effects of specific bridging tasks in different domains); b) inform the development of a taxonomy (a classification scheme guiding communication on this topic); or c) assist in the specification of bridging in research and practice so that these tasks can be replicated in other implementation or research initiatives [9,12]. In the present review, it was found that most bridging tasks evaluated were on a micro level within health and social service delivery, and further descriptive research identifying the efficacy, scalability, and sustainability of such tasks would be beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Mapping also enabled separation of the tasks themselves, from inputs driving these actions, and the outcomes that result. The matrices published in this paper could potentially be used to a) generate research questions (e.g., evaluating the effects of specific bridging tasks in different domains); b) inform the development of a taxonomy (a classification scheme guiding communication on this topic); or c) assist in the specification of bridging in research and practice so that these tasks can be replicated in other implementation or research initiatives [9,12]. In the present review, it was found that most bridging tasks evaluated were on a micro level within health and social service delivery, and further descriptive research identifying the efficacy, scalability, and sustainability of such tasks would be beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some limitations to this scoping review. Firstly, we chose to focus the search on studies discussing the literature on aging with disability, and restricted "disability" to the areas of developmental and neurological disability [12]. This was initially done as it provided more selective definitions of disability and was an area that already had a body of literature surrounding bridging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations