The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2017.8036782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly-supervised learning for Parkinson's Disease tremor detection

Abstract: Continuous, automated monitoring of Parkinsons Disease (PD) symptoms would provide clinicians with more information to understand their patients' disease progression and adjust treatment protocols, thereby improving PD care. Collecting precisely labeled data for Parkinson's symptoms, such as tremor, is difficult. Therefore, algorithms for monitoring should only require weakly-labeled training data. In this paper, we evaluate five standard weakly-supervised algorithms and propose a "stratified" version of three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
32
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The more recent work of [24], extended the previous approach by using a dataset of 5 PD patients all of which exhibited tremor. Data collection took place under laboratory conditions that resembled a home environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more recent work of [24], extended the previous approach by using a dataset of 5 PD patients all of which exhibited tremor. Data collection took place under laboratory conditions that resembled a home environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At best, weak labels (presence, absence, or the approximate amount of a symptom within a time segment) can be provided by participants of the data collections. Weakly supervised algorithms, such as multiple-instance learning, explicitly account for weak labels, and tend to perform better than standard, fully supervised learning algorithms in these scenarios [ 4 ]. In summary, collecting data, labeling them, and learning from such data are all more challenging in wild environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each feature set is followed with either a Random Forest (RF) or Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier to distinguish the various performance contributions of features versus algorithms. We compare the performance of our best feature set and algorithm combination with the three most relevant systems described in the literature: [ 4 , 6 , 7 ]. We also compare our method with [ 4 ] (best among [ 6 , 7 ]) in the ability to reproduce patient self-reports, the current standard for in-home symptom monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radar based approaches used predefined features from the time-frequency representation (TFR) of the radar return signal to monitor human gait [2]. Sensor based approaches detect gait abnormality or tremors using contact sensors such as MetaMotionRan Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor from Mbientlab [3] and the Axivity AX3 accelerometer [4]. Camera based approaches recognizes gait abnormality or tremors using the Kinect camera [5], [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%