2018
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ONO-1301 Enhances in vitro Osteoblast Differentiation and in vivo Bone Formation Induced by Bone Morphogenetic Protein

Abstract: N/A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…miR-103a-3p is thought to exert antitumor effects in different tumors such as bladder cancer 30 and glioma. 31 Notably, miR-103a-3p may act as a target gene for many lncRNAs in human tumors. Tang et al 32 found that AFAP1-AS1 functions as a ceRNA for miR-103a-3p and promotes the proliferation of pituitary adenoma cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…miR-103a-3p is thought to exert antitumor effects in different tumors such as bladder cancer 30 and glioma. 31 Notably, miR-103a-3p may act as a target gene for many lncRNAs in human tumors. Tang et al 32 found that AFAP1-AS1 functions as a ceRNA for miR-103a-3p and promotes the proliferation of pituitary adenoma cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IP receptor appears to be expressed in both human osteoblast and osteoclast (Fortier et al, 2001;Sarrazin et al, 2001). A selective IP-receptor agonist, ONO-1301, has been shown in rodent models to promote BMP-induced bone formation and, more specifically, the osteoblast differentiation in vitro and the ectopic and orthotopic bone formation in vivo (Kanayama et al, 2018).…”
Section: Osteoclastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Novel osteobiologics and enhancers of BMP-2 may also provide opportunities for increased fusion rates. 24,28 Development of clinically significant PJK is likely multifactorial and may never be completely eliminated. Preplanned machine-bent rods may reduce junctional failures by helping to ensure that desired alignment corrections are achieved, including overall magnitudes of thoracic and lumbar curves, location of LL restoration (e.g., in the lower lumbar levels), and appropriate contouring of the proximal end of the rod.…”
Section: Advances To Further Reduce Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%