How do general practitioners put preventive care recommendations into practice? A cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France

Abstract

ObjectivesWe previously identified that general practitioners (GPs) in French-speaking regions of Europe had a variable uptake of common preventive recommendations. In this study, we describe GPs’ reports of how they put different preventive recommendations into practice.Design, setting and participantsCross-sectional study conducted in 2015 in Switzerland and France. 3400 randomly selected GPs were asked to complete a postal (n=1100) or online (n=2300) questionnaire. GPs who exclusively practiced complementary and alternative medicine were not eligible for the study. 764 GPs (response rate: postal 47%, online 11%) returned the questionnaire (428 in Switzerland and 336 in France).Main outcome measuresWe investigated how the GPs performed five preventive practices (screening for dyslipidaemia, colorectal and prostate cancer, identification of hazardous alcohol consumption and brief intervention), examining which age group they selected, the screening frequency, the test they used, whether they favoured shared decision for prostate cancer screening and their definition of hazardous alcohol use.ResultsA large variability was observed in the way in which GPs provide these practices. 41% reported screening yearly for cholesterol, starting and stopping at variable ages. 82% did not use any test to identify hazardous drinking. The most common responses for defining hazardous drinking were, for men, ≥21 drinks/week (24%) and ≥4 drinks/occasion for binge drinking (20%), and for women, ≥14 drinks/week (28%) and ≥3 drinks/occasion (21%). Screening for colorectal cancer, mainly with colonoscopy in Switzerland (86%) and stool-based tests in France (93%), was provided every 10 years in Switzerland (65%) and 2 years in France (91%) to patients between 50 years (87%) and 75 years (67%). Prostate cancer screening, usually with shared decision (82%), was provided yearly (62%) to patients between 50 years (74%) and 75–80 years (32%–34%).ConclusionsThe large diversity in the way these practices are provided needs to be addressed, as it could be related to some misunderstandingof the current guidelines, to barriers for guideline uptake or, more likely, to the absence of agreement between the various recommendations.

Financial reimbursement - Irrelevant for GPs' readiness to implement brief intervention to reduce alcohol consumption? A cross-sectional vignette study.

“…Although our results were only recorded in Germany, they seem to be valid internationally too. Comparative studies are available, for instance, for Switzerland and France (26), as well as Sweden and the Netherlands (27). Both studies provide corresponding results.…”

Managing hypertension in frail oldest-old – the role of guideline use by general practitioners from 29 countries

“…The development of future guidelines should ideally help in achieving a higher agreement among guidelines. The absence of agreement between the various recommendations was found to be associated with a large variation in how GPs apply preventive measures [20]. Further, guideline committees would benefit from larger efforts in consulting patients as well as GPs to raise more awareness of their patients' specificity.…”

Impact of health information technology optimization on clinical quality performance in health centers: A national cross-sectional study

“…This is compared to the 60% of all U.S. office-based physicians (MD/ DO) who reported meaningful use of certified health IT to the CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2016. The positive association between practice size and MU in adult and pediatric preventive care suggests that successful implementation of clinical care and workflow supported by health IT contributes to reducing the burden of preventable chronic disease [19,[36][37][38]. Previous research suggests that the relationship between eCQM performance and practice size is in part attributable to available human and financial capital [39,40].…”