Communicating the promise, risks, and ethics of large-scale, open space microbiome and metagenome research

Abstract

The public commonly associates microorganisms with pathogens. This suspicion of microorganisms is understandable, as historically microorganisms have killed more humans than any other agent while remaining largely unknown until the late seventeenth century with the works of van Leeuwenhoek and Kircher. Despite our improved understanding regarding microorganisms, the general public are apt to think of diseases rather than of the majority of harmless or beneficial species that inhabit our bodies and the built and natural environment. As long as microbiome research was confined to labs, the public’s exposure to microbiology was limited. The recent launch of global microbiome surveys, such as the Earth Microbiome Project and MetaSUB (Metagenomics and Metadesign of Subways and Urban Biomes) project, has raised ethical, financial, feasibility, and sustainability concerns as to the public’s level of understanding and potential reaction to the findings, which, done improperly, risk negative implications for ongoing and future investigations, but done correctly, can facilitate a new vision of “smart cities.” To facilitate improved future research, we describe here the major concerns that our discussions with ethics committees, community leaders, and government officials have raised, and we expound on how to address them. We further discuss ethical considerations of microbiome surveys and provide practical recommendations for public engagement.

Forensic Applications of Microbiomics: A Review

“…Many challenges remain to overcome, such as contamination issues, modest study sample sizes, model over-specification and misspecification, prediction accuracies of machine learning techniques, understanding complex spatial and temporal variations in environmental microbiome dynamics, as well as risks and ethical concerns ( Shamarina et al, 2017 ). Notably, even human DNA-based evidence, which is far better understood, is not error-proof, as indicated by the Phantom of Heilbronn case ( Daniel and van Oorschot, 2011 ).…”

Seven facts and five initiatives for gut microbiome research

“…The public are expected to understand, appreciate and eventually participate into the microbiome research and translation, while the research and translation themselves have to effectively avoid risk and safety issues (Dominguez-Bello et al, 2016;Shamarina et al, 2017). It is widely accepted that ethics has to be obeyed during the process of research and translation (O'Doherty et al, 2016;Rhodes 2016).…”

Making the microbiome public: Participatory experiments with DNA sequencing in domestic kitchens

“…While these ideals of democratisation and citizenship are prominent in the narratives of those involved in taking metagenomics out of the lab, in practice most of these projects are premised on a rather modest redistribution of political agency, and a rather narrow appreciation of the epistemic diversity associated with public understandings of microbes (Shamarina et al., ). While publics may be involved in the scientific process as microbial gatherers or data‐recipients, they rarely get to shape the agenda of the research projects they are involved in.…”