Visuomotor effects of body part movements presented in the first‐person perspective on imitative behavior

Abstract

Imitative stimuli presented from a first-person perspective (FPP) produce stronger visuomotor effects than those presented from a third-person perspective (TPP) due to the relatively greater response of the mirror neuron system (MNS) to FPP stimuli. Some previous studies utilizing TPP stimuli have reported no differences in MNS activity between moving and static bodies' stimuli. However, few studies have compared visuomotor effects of such stimuli when presented in the FPP. To clarify this issue, we measured cortical activation in 17 participants during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imitation task involving three conditions: moving (a lifting finger was presented), static (an "X" appeared on a static finger), and control (an "X" appeared on a button). All stimuli were presented from the FPP or TPP. Participants were asked to lift the finger corresponding to the imitative stimulus. In the FPP condition, moving stimuli elicited greater MNS activation than static stimuli. Furthermore, such movement effects were stronger in the MNS and insula (a region associated with body-ownership) for FPP stimuli than for TPP stimuli. Psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed increased connectivity between the MNS and insula for moving stimuli in the FPP condition. These findings suggest that bodily movements presented in the FPP elicit a greater visuomotor response than static body presented in the FPP, and that the visuomotor effects of bodily movements were greater in the FPP condition than in the TPP condition. Our analyses further indicated that such responses are processed via the neural system underlying body-ownership. Hum Brain Mapp 38:6218-6229, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The study of movement skills in sports: toward an integrative approach

“…It can be hypothesized that similar activation takes place in humans and that the mirroring function plays a role in the learning and critical evaluation of movement skills. This provides further empirical evidence for a non-dualist approach to understanding skill execution ( Birch, 2017 ) and may have interesting practical implications, among them as a rationale for imitation as a main didactic approach in skill learning ( Watanabe et al, 2017 ).…”

Effects of pseudoexperience on the understanding of hemiplegic movements in physical therapists: An fMRI study

“…In the present study, all of the stimuli were presented from the third person perspective (3PP), as PTs generally observe and assess their patients from the 3PP. Additionally, in many previous studies investigating imitative behavior or action observation, the 3PP has been considered to be another person's viewpoint (as if the observers are facing the others) (Bortoletto et al, 2013; Jackson et al, 2006; Kelly and Wheaton, 2013; Vistoli et al, 2016; Watanabe et al, 2017). Based on the fact that PTs observe the patients as “other”, we considered that the 3PP was more appropriate for our study compared to the first person perspective, in which the observers observe movement from their own perspective.…”

Future Challenges in the Assessment of Proprioception in Exercise Sciences: Is Imitation an Alternative?

“…Imitation ability is supported by a direct visuospatial route in which the visual input resulted in motor output (Vivanti, 2013 ). Indeed, when a person observes other people's movements, the somatosensory area of the brain that controls motor actions is active (Hanawa et al, 2016 ; Watanabe et al, 2017 ). Imitation ability could be assessed via imitation of prerecorded human whole-body complex motions in real time.…”