Abstract:Recently, there has been an increasing focus on the pursuit of targets considered to be less druggable that offer potential for development of promising new therapeutic agents for the treatment of diseases with large unmet medical need, particularly in the areas of oncology and virology. However, conducting drug discovery campaigns in "beyond rule of 5" (bRo5) chemical space presents a significant drug design and development challenge to medicinal chemists to achieve acceptable oral pharmacokinetics. Retrospec… Show more
“…First, the drug/lead-likeness criteria forp hysicochemical properties (first, the Ro5) are challenged by compounds from beyondt he rule of five (bRo5)c hemical space (e.g.,a ntiviral agents Simeprevir and Ledipasvir). [252] Next, the relevance of substructural filters is confronted by covalent ligands bearing classicale lectrophilic moieties, such as Michael acceptors (e.g., anticancer agent Afatinib). [253] Both types of these "rule breakers" are discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2.…”
Section: Toom Any Rules For Drug Discovery?mentioning
All pharmaceutical products contain organic molecules; the source may be a natural product or a fully synthetic molecule, or a combination of both. Thus, it follows that organic chemistry underpins both existing and upcoming pharmaceutical products. The reverse relationship has also affected organic synthesis, changing its landscape towards increasingly complex targets. This Review article sets out to give a concise appraisal of this symbiotic relationship between organic chemistry and drug discovery, along with a discussion of the design concepts and highlighting key milestones along the journey. In particular, criteria for a high‐quality compound library design enabling efficient virtual navigation of chemical space, as well as rise and fall of concepts for its synthetic exploration (such as combinatorial chemistry; diversity‐, biology‐, lead‐, or fragment‐oriented syntheses; and DNA‐encoded libraries) are critically surveyed.
“…First, the drug/lead-likeness criteria forp hysicochemical properties (first, the Ro5) are challenged by compounds from beyondt he rule of five (bRo5)c hemical space (e.g.,a ntiviral agents Simeprevir and Ledipasvir). [252] Next, the relevance of substructural filters is confronted by covalent ligands bearing classicale lectrophilic moieties, such as Michael acceptors (e.g., anticancer agent Afatinib). [253] Both types of these "rule breakers" are discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2.…”
Section: Toom Any Rules For Drug Discovery?mentioning
All pharmaceutical products contain organic molecules; the source may be a natural product or a fully synthetic molecule, or a combination of both. Thus, it follows that organic chemistry underpins both existing and upcoming pharmaceutical products. The reverse relationship has also affected organic synthesis, changing its landscape towards increasingly complex targets. This Review article sets out to give a concise appraisal of this symbiotic relationship between organic chemistry and drug discovery, along with a discussion of the design concepts and highlighting key milestones along the journey. In particular, criteria for a high‐quality compound library design enabling efficient virtual navigation of chemical space, as well as rise and fall of concepts for its synthetic exploration (such as combinatorial chemistry; diversity‐, biology‐, lead‐, or fragment‐oriented syntheses; and DNA‐encoded libraries) are critically surveyed.
“…To bridge the gap between small molecules and biologics, compounds in the beyond rule of 5 (bRo5) space, such as peptides, peptidomimetics and macrocycles, are currently attracting major interest . By analysis of a comprehensive set of >200 orally administered drugs and clinical candidates residing in bRo5 space we have shown that bRo5‐ligands provide improved opportunities for the modulation of difficult‐to‐drug targets .…”
It has been hypothesised that drugs in the chemical space "beyond the rule of 5" (bRo5) must behavea smolecular chameleons to combine otherwisec onflicting properties, including aqueous solubility,c ell permeability and target binding. Evidence for this has, however,b een limited to the cyclic peptidec yclosporine A. Herein, we show that the non-peptidic and macrocyclic drugs roxithromycin, telithromycin and spiramycin behave as molecular chameleons, with rifampicin showing al ess pronounced behaviour.I n particular roxithromycin, telithromycin and spiramycin display am arked, yet limited flexibility and populate signifi-cantly less polar and more compact conformational ensembles in an apolart han in ap olar environment. In addition to balancingo fm embrane permeability and aqueous solubility, this flexibility also allows binding to targetst hat vary in structure between species. The drugs' passivec ell permeability correlates to their 3D polar surface area and corroborate two theoretical models for permeability,d eveloped for cyclic peptides. We conclude that molecular chameleonicity should be incorporated in the design of orally administered drugs in the bRo5 space.[a] Dr.
“…The emerging interest for IMHBs can be summarized as follows: IMHB formation can mask polar groups and thus impact upon the triad of permeability, solubility, and potency of drugs and candidates. IMHB modulation is, therefore, a promising strategy that can be applied to any chemical space (small molecules and beyond rule of 5 [bRo5]) as a means of discovering drug candidates with both acceptable potency and ADME‐Tox profiles …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMHB modulation is, therefore, a promising strategy that can be applied to any chemical space (small molecules and beyond rule of 5 [bRo5]) as a means of discovering drug candidates with both acceptable potency and ADME-Tox profiles. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Currently, peptides are probably the most appreciated bRo5 derivatives by pharmaceutical researchers. They are easily accessible via solid phase synthesis, highly selective, relatively safe, and well tolerated.…”
Recent literature shows that intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) formation can positively impact upon the triad of permeability, solubility, and potency of drugs and candidates. IMHB modulation can be applied to compounds in any chemical space as a means for discovering drug candidates with both acceptable potency and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion‐Tox profiles. Integrating IMHB formation in design of drugs is, therefore, an exciting and timely challenge for modern medicinal chemistry. In this review, we first provide some background about IMHBs from the medicinal chemist's point of view and highlight some IMHB‐associated misconceptions. Second, we propose a classification of IMHBs for drug discovery purposes, review the most common in silico tactics to include IMHBs in lead optimization and list some experimental physicochemical descriptors, which quantify the propensity of compounds to form IMHBs. By focusing on the compounds size and the number of IMHBs that can potentially be formed, we also outline the major difficulties encountered when designing compounds based on the inclusion of IMHBs. Finally, we discuss recent case studies illustrating the application of IMHB to optimize cell permeability and physicochemical properties of small molecules, cyclic peptides and macrocycles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.