2017
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin resistance and cardiovascular outcomes in the ORIGIN trial

Abstract: Insulin resistance may not promote cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with dysglycaemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insulin resistance is always claimed when insulin fails to elicit a normal physiological response that is presented by hyperglycemia in face of normal or even higher insulin levels [31] , which is confirmed by monitoring elevated (HOMA-IR) value [5] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Insulin resistance is always claimed when insulin fails to elicit a normal physiological response that is presented by hyperglycemia in face of normal or even higher insulin levels [31] , which is confirmed by monitoring elevated (HOMA-IR) value [5] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin resistance associated with many health problems, of which its hazards to the cardiovascular system including stroke, coronary artery disease and cardiomyopathy [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin resistance was measured as defined previously, using the insulin res in the ORIGIN trial to achieve normoglycemia. 33 Models assessing local ancestry associations demonstrated that the African local estimate associated with increased C-peptide at rs4149261 was also associated with increased risk of T2D (OR ¼ 6.07 per SD, 95% CI 1.44 to 25.56, p ¼ 0.01) and median dose of insulin used (per kg of fat-free mass, log transformed) (b ¼ 0.54 per SD, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.92, p ¼ 0.005). However, African local estimates at rs3769050 were not associated with T2D or insulin resistance (p > 0.05).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Role Of C-peptide In Disparities In T2d Risk Among Ethnic Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used the motivating example that intensification of metformin therapy with insulin versus with sulfonylurea was associated with increased risk of mortality to explore whether substantial residual confounding due to unmeasured frailty may have affected this comparison (1,20). While a large randomized controlled trial has shown neutral effect of insulin on the risk of cardiovascular events, in this study, we sought to examine the potential influence of frailty as a confounder, an unmeasured effect that may influence both the exposure and outcomes, in observational studies (21). To estimate the potential confounding by frailty, we estimated the hazard ratio of death between two FI values corresponding to the mean FI for patients on metformin plus insulin and for patients on metformin plus sulfonylurea.…”
Section: Motivating Example: Estimation Of Residual Confounding Due Tmentioning
confidence: 99%