2017
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable isotope discrimination factors and between‐tissue isotope comparisons for bone and skin from captive and wild green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas)

Abstract: RATIONALE The ecological application of stable isotope analysis (SIA) relies on taxa-and tissue-specific stable carbon (Δ13C) and nitrogen (Δ15N) isotope discrimination factors, determined with captive animals reared on known diets for sufficient time to reflect dietary isotope ratios. However, captive studies often prohibit lethal sampling, are difficult with endangered species, and reflect conditions not experienced in the wild. METHODS We overcame these constraints and determined the Δ13C and Δ15N values … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stable isotope mixing models require estimates of diet-tissue trophic discrimination factors (TDFs; )-the difference in isotopic ratios between consumers and their diet-to estimate the proportional contribution of different prey groups to consumer diets. As diet-bone TDFs have not been quantified for Kemp's ridleys or other primarily carnivorous sea turtles, we used dietbone TDFs estimated from dead, captive, juvenile green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) ( 13 C = 2.1 ± 0.6, 15 N = 5.1 ± 1.1) (Turner Tomaszewicz et al, 2017b). Although these turtles were maintained on omnivorous diets composed of ∼56% animal matter (squid, shrimp, and fish) and ∼43% plant matter (lettuce) by weight, percent digestible N and C from animal protein was estimated to be 96.8 and 81.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Mixing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stable isotope mixing models require estimates of diet-tissue trophic discrimination factors (TDFs; )-the difference in isotopic ratios between consumers and their diet-to estimate the proportional contribution of different prey groups to consumer diets. As diet-bone TDFs have not been quantified for Kemp's ridleys or other primarily carnivorous sea turtles, we used dietbone TDFs estimated from dead, captive, juvenile green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) ( 13 C = 2.1 ± 0.6, 15 N = 5.1 ± 1.1) (Turner Tomaszewicz et al, 2017b). Although these turtles were maintained on omnivorous diets composed of ∼56% animal matter (squid, shrimp, and fish) and ∼43% plant matter (lettuce) by weight, percent digestible N and C from animal protein was estimated to be 96.8 and 81.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Mixing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our study, a growth-induced decline in 15 N values may have caused us to underestimate the proportional contribution of fish to turtle diets for faster growing individuals. In contrast, animals that consume large amounts of animal-derived proteins typically have higher 15 N values (Vander Zanden et al, 2012;Kurle et al, 2014;Turner Tomaszewicz et al, 2017b). A diet-induced increase in 15 N would therefore potentially have the opposite effect as growth on TDFs, causing an overestimation of the proportional contribution of fish to turtle diets for individuals that forage higher in the food web.…”
Section: Trophic Ecology and Somatic Growth Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although collagen has been analysed for decades in archaeology, collagen from a wider range of species and tissues has been increasingly studied in contemporary contexts (e.g. Dixon, Dempson, & Power, 2015; Guiry, Royle, et al, 2020; Skovrind et al., 2019; Turner Tomaszewicz, Seminoff, Price, & Kurle, 2017; Vokhshoori et al., 2019). In part, this is because collagen (Table 1) is the most abundant protein in many tissues that are routinely archived in biological and conservation programmes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we lack a comprehensive framework to compare stable isotope values across all combinations of sampled tissues and across all species. Although a few studies have proposed conversion factors for some pairs of tissues, they were typically within a single species and life stage (Ceriani et al, ; Kaufman et al, ; Tomaszewicz et al, ). Hence, there is no common currency that would permit standardised comparison across all tissues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%