Abstract:A morphogen gradient of Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling patterns the dorsoventral embryonic axis of vertebrates and invertebrates. The prevailing view in vertebrates for BMP gradient formation is through a counter-gradient of BMP antagonists, often along with ligand shuttling to generate peak signaling levels. To delineate the mechanism in zebrafish, we precisely quantified the BMP activity gradient in wild-type and mutant embryos and combined these data with a mathematical model-based computational… Show more
“…We also note the gradually declining expression of grem2b: a secreted dorsal Bmp signaling inhibitor, which is upregulated by both Edn1 and Jag/Notch, and downregulated by Bmp signaling . These results add a new level of temporal complexity to our computational models for the zebrafish D-V arch GRN (Clouthier et al, 2010;Meinecke et al, 2018) similar to models in other patterning systems (Pomreinke et al, 2017;Sagner & Briscoe, 2017;Zinski et al, 2017) particularly for processes involving multiple signals in concert (Zagorski et al, 2017). Testing how combinatorial signals lead to such temporal expression kinetics will require experimental manipulation of morphogen gradients at specific times and locations such as with heat-shock inducible transgenic constructs Zuniga et al, 2011).…”
Section: Temporal Expression Profiles Of Mouse Arch Patterning Genementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Examples include the interaction of Bmp and Shh signaling in D-V neural tube patterning (Liem, Jessell, & Briscoe, 2000;Zagorski et al, 2017) and the interaction of Wnt, retinoic acid (RA) and Fgf signaling in A-P body axis patterning (McGrew, Hoppler, & Moon, 1997;White, Nie, Lander, & Schilling, 2007). Measurements of morphogen diffusion and immediate downstream target genes, combined with computational modeling, have clarified which of several alternative models of signaling are applicable, such as a source-sink model for early embryonic patterning in zebrafish by the Bmp pathway (Pomreinke et al, 2017;Zinski et al, 2017). Precise measurements of target gene expression, such as those in the Nodal signaling pathway, have also suggested that in some morphogen systems the kinetics of expression are more important than more classical threshold models for proper patterning (Dubrulle et al, 2015).…”
Summary
The mandibular or first pharyngeal arch forms the upper and lower jaws in all gnathostomes. A gene regulatory network that defines ventral, intermediate, and dorsal domains along the dorsal-ventral (D-V) axis of the arch has emerged from studies in zebrafish and mice, but the temporal dynamics of this process remain unclear. To define cell fate trajectories in the arches we have performed quantitative gene expression analyses of D-V patterning genes in pharyngeal arch primordia in zebrafish and mice. Using NanoString technology to measure transcript numbers per cell directly we show that, in many cases, genes expressed in similar D-V domains and induced by similar signals vary dramatically in their temporal profiles. This suggests that cellular responses to D-V patterning signals are likely shaped by the baseline kinetics of target gene expression. Furthermore, similarities in the temporal dynamics of genes that occupy distinct pathways suggest novel shared modes of regulation. Incorporating these gene expression kinetics into our computational models for the mandibular arch improves the accuracy of patterning, and facilitates temporal comparisons between species. These data suggest that the magnitude and timing of target gene expression help diversify responses to patterning signals during craniofacial development.
“…We also note the gradually declining expression of grem2b: a secreted dorsal Bmp signaling inhibitor, which is upregulated by both Edn1 and Jag/Notch, and downregulated by Bmp signaling . These results add a new level of temporal complexity to our computational models for the zebrafish D-V arch GRN (Clouthier et al, 2010;Meinecke et al, 2018) similar to models in other patterning systems (Pomreinke et al, 2017;Sagner & Briscoe, 2017;Zinski et al, 2017) particularly for processes involving multiple signals in concert (Zagorski et al, 2017). Testing how combinatorial signals lead to such temporal expression kinetics will require experimental manipulation of morphogen gradients at specific times and locations such as with heat-shock inducible transgenic constructs Zuniga et al, 2011).…”
Section: Temporal Expression Profiles Of Mouse Arch Patterning Genementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Examples include the interaction of Bmp and Shh signaling in D-V neural tube patterning (Liem, Jessell, & Briscoe, 2000;Zagorski et al, 2017) and the interaction of Wnt, retinoic acid (RA) and Fgf signaling in A-P body axis patterning (McGrew, Hoppler, & Moon, 1997;White, Nie, Lander, & Schilling, 2007). Measurements of morphogen diffusion and immediate downstream target genes, combined with computational modeling, have clarified which of several alternative models of signaling are applicable, such as a source-sink model for early embryonic patterning in zebrafish by the Bmp pathway (Pomreinke et al, 2017;Zinski et al, 2017). Precise measurements of target gene expression, such as those in the Nodal signaling pathway, have also suggested that in some morphogen systems the kinetics of expression are more important than more classical threshold models for proper patterning (Dubrulle et al, 2015).…”
Summary
The mandibular or first pharyngeal arch forms the upper and lower jaws in all gnathostomes. A gene regulatory network that defines ventral, intermediate, and dorsal domains along the dorsal-ventral (D-V) axis of the arch has emerged from studies in zebrafish and mice, but the temporal dynamics of this process remain unclear. To define cell fate trajectories in the arches we have performed quantitative gene expression analyses of D-V patterning genes in pharyngeal arch primordia in zebrafish and mice. Using NanoString technology to measure transcript numbers per cell directly we show that, in many cases, genes expressed in similar D-V domains and induced by similar signals vary dramatically in their temporal profiles. This suggests that cellular responses to D-V patterning signals are likely shaped by the baseline kinetics of target gene expression. Furthermore, similarities in the temporal dynamics of genes that occupy distinct pathways suggest novel shared modes of regulation. Incorporating these gene expression kinetics into our computational models for the mandibular arch improves the accuracy of patterning, and facilitates temporal comparisons between species. These data suggest that the magnitude and timing of target gene expression help diversify responses to patterning signals during craniofacial development.
“…Morphogens near the local source get attached to the shuttle and the morphogen‐shuttle complex is transported across tissues. Subsequently, the morphogen‐shuttle complex is degraded, resulting in the morphogen being immobilized to stationary negative diffusion regulators and formation of a gradient …”
Section: Parallels Between Neurotransmission and Morphogen‐based Tranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the morphogen-shuttle complex is degraded, resulting in the morphogen being immobilized to stationary negative diffusion regulators and formation of a gradient. 52,60 Beyond extracellular-diffusion-based morphogen transport, several studies suggest that morphogens also can be transported through cell-based mechanisms via transcytosis or along cellular extensions known as cytonemes. [61][62][63] In the case of transcytosis, signaling molecules are taken up by cells through endocytosis and subsequently released through exocytosis into the extracellular space.…”
Section: Parallels Between Neurotransmission and Morphogen-based Trmentioning
The development of an organism from an undifferentiated single cell into a spatially complex structure requires spatial patterning of cell fates across tissues. Positional information, proposed by Lewis Wolpert in 1969, has led to the characterization of many components involved in regulating morphogen signaling activity. However, how morphogen gradients are established, maintained, and interpreted by cells still is not fully understood. Quantitative and systems‐based approaches are increasingly needed to define general biological design rules that govern positional information systems in developing organisms. This short review highlights a selective set of studies that have investigated the roles of physiological signaling in modulating and mediating morphogen‐based pattern formation. Similarities between neural transmission and morphogen‐based pattern formation mechanisms suggest underlying shared principles of active cell‐based communication. Within larger tissues, neural networks provide directed information, via physiological signaling, that supplements positional information through diffusion. Further, mounting evidence demonstrates that physiological signaling plays a role in ensuring robustness of morphogen‐based signaling. We conclude by highlighting several outstanding questions regarding the role of physiological signaling in morphogen‐based pattern formation. Elucidating how physiological signaling impacts positional information is critical for understanding the close coupling of developmental and cellular processes in the context of development, disease, and regeneration.
“…Example geometries and a time-lapse of a single solution are shown in Figure 2A. To test the Partial Differential Equation (PDE)-based models developed herein, we used the previously published point cloud data for P-Smad5 (readout of BMP signaling) that is available online at Zinski et al (Zinski et al 2017). To apply these data to our model, we processed the data by fitting the original data to a standard size hemisphere with different levels of coverage along the elevation direction based on the embryonic stage of development.…”
Section: Measurement Of Source Distributionsmentioning
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) play an important role in dorsal-ventral (DV) patterning of the early zebrafish embryo. BMP signaling is regulated by a network of extracellular and intracellular factors that impact the range and signaling of BMP ligands. Recent advances in understanding the mechanism of pattern formation support a source-sink mechanism, however it is not clear how the source-sink mechanism shapes patterns in 3D, nor how sensitive the pattern is to biophysical rates and boundary conditions along both the anteroposterior (AP) and DV axes of the embryo. We propose a new three-dimensional growing Partial Differential Equation (PDE)-based model to simulate the BMP patterning process during the blastula stage. This model provides a starting point to elucidate how different mechanisms and components work together in 3D to create and maintain the BMP gradient in the embryo. We also show how the 3D model fits the BMP signaling gradient data at multiple time points along both axes. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis of the model suggests that the spatiotemporal patterns of Chordin and BMP ligand gene expression are dominant drivers of shape in 3D and more work is needed to quantify the spatiotemporal profiles of gene and protein expression to further refine the models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.