“…There are at least five sources of diversity in AMPA receptor complexes: (1) Separate genes encode distinct isoforms of AMPA receptors (there are four AMPA receptors in vertebrates, GluA1-4); (2) Post-transcriptional modifications of these receptors, including alternative splicing (Penn and Greger, 2009 ) and RNA editing (Hood and Emeson, 2012 ) which can generate many different forms of the proteins even from the same transcribed mRNA (Greger et al, 2017 ); (3) The tetrameric structure of the receptors allows multiple combinations of distinct genes and post-transcriptionally modified genes to combine, increasing the complexity of a single tetrameric receptor (Henley and Wilkinson, 2016 ); (4) Post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation (Lu and Roche, 2012 ; Wang et al, 2014 ), ubiquitination (Goo et al, 2015 ), acetylation (Wang et al, 2017 ), and palmitoylation (Han et al, 2015 ) alter the function of the receptors; and (5) Distinct associated proteins make up distinct AMPA receptor complexes, such as TARPS, Cornichons, and others (Schwenk et al, 2012 ). Since a large amount of synaptic plasticity rests on transferring AMPA receptors in and out of the postsynaptic density, it does not take much imagination to see that depending on the composition of these AMPA receptor complexes, the regulation of their insertion and removal at synapses will be different.…”