A systematic review to identify and assess the effectiveness of alternatives for people over the age of 65 who are at risk of potentially avoidable hospital admission

Abstract

Background/objectivesThere are some older patients who are ‘at the decision margin’ of admission. This systematic review sought to explore this issue with the following objective: what admission alternatives are there for older patients and are they safe, effective and cost-effective? A secondary objective was to identify the characteristics of those older patients for whom the decision to admit to hospital may be unclear.DesignSystematic review of controlled studies (April 2005–December 2016) with searches in Medline, Embase, Cinahl and CENTRAL databases. The protocol is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42015020371). Studies were assessed using Cochrane risk of bias criteria, and relevant reviews were assessed with the AMSTAR tool. The results are presented narratively and discussed.SettingPrimary and secondary healthcare interface.ParticipantsPeople aged over 65 years at risk of an unplanned admission.InterventionsAny community-based intervention offered as an alternative to admission to an acute hospital.Primary and secondary outcomes measuresReduction in secondary care use, patient-related outcomes, safety and costs.ResultsNineteen studies and seven systematic reviews were identified. These recruited patients with both specific conditions and mixed chronic and acute conditions. The interventions involved paramedic/emergency care practitioners (n=3), emergency department-based interventions (n=3), community hospitals (n=2) and hospital-at-home services (n=11). Data suggest that alternatives to admission appear safe with potential to reduce secondary care use and length of time receiving care. There is a lack of patient-related outcomes and cost data. The important features of older patients for whom the decision to admit is uncertain are: age over 75 years, comorbidities/multi-morbidities, dementia, home situation, social support and individual coping abilities.ConclusionsThis systematic review describes and assesses evidence on alternatives to acute care for older patients and shows that many of the options available are safe and appear to reduce resource use. However, cost analyses and patient preference data are lacking.

Drivers of potentially avoidable emergency admissions in Ireland: an ecological analysis

“…Of the ‘potentially avoidable’ conditions included in this study, COPD had the second highest share of emergency admissions at 15%. However, if other services in the wider care system were available such as a ‘hospital at home’64 or ‘care outreach’ model65 which can respond to patients’ need, it may be possible to avoid such admissions 5 66…”

Measuring and optimising the efficiency of community hospital inpatient care for older people: the MoCHA mixed-methods study

“…There is much uncertainty about how best to address the pressing issue of admission avoidance. 97 Our finding that the CRT form of intermediate care can function as a substitution service for brief emergency admissions to hospital for older people is therefore an important one for commissioners. It provides greater confidence that investment in these types of services can indeed reduce secondary care utilisation for a growing and vulnerable population group.…”

David Oliver: Avoiding hospital admission—are we really falling short?

“…But, in a series of systematic reviews, researchers at Bristol and Cardiff found no consistent evidence that interventions to reduce hospital attendance or admissions succeeded 9. A further systematic review of studies focusing on people over 65 with a predicted high risk of admission also found no compelling evidence 10…”