2017
DOI: 10.1159/000454766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-Guided Intrauterine Labeling of Rat Fetuses

Abstract: Aim: To compare intra-amniotic versus fetal subcutaneous injections for selective fetal labeling in multifetal rat pregnancies. Methods: A total of 14 pregnant rats were randomized to receive intra-amniotic injections of dyes (including Fluorescein, Indigo Carmine, or Evans Blue) or fetal subcutaneous injections (of commercial tattoo ink) both guided by ultrasound at 15-17 days of gestation. Survival, injection, and labeling success rates of both techniques were compared. Results: Survival rates (84.4% for int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, for technical reasons, the sex of the fetus could not be determined reliably by ultrasound and therefore postnatal sex assignment in imaged fetuses has the potential for error. To address this weakness in future investigations, we intend to perform ultrasound-guided injections of a dye to label the fetuses that are imaged so they can be more robustly identified after dissection for subsequent genotyping [46]. This will provide valuable information about whether the effects on UA blood flow, MCA PI, and fetal cardiac function are sex-specific.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, for technical reasons, the sex of the fetus could not be determined reliably by ultrasound and therefore postnatal sex assignment in imaged fetuses has the potential for error. To address this weakness in future investigations, we intend to perform ultrasound-guided injections of a dye to label the fetuses that are imaged so they can be more robustly identified after dissection for subsequent genotyping [46]. This will provide valuable information about whether the effects on UA blood flow, MCA PI, and fetal cardiac function are sex-specific.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, for technical reasons, the sex of the fetus could not be determined reliably by ultrasound. In the future, we plan to tag the fetuses with a dye injection 29 so they can easily be identified upon dissection to collect samples for genotyping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments using in utero gene delivery methods are usually performed on mid- to late-gestational fetuses (from E9–18), probably because they are relatively easier to be identified by visual observation and also can be used in basic research on in utero gene therapy [ 15 ]. All these experiments were based on the opening of the abdominal portion of an anesthetized pregnant animal, exposure of uterine horns, and injection of a solution into a specific site of a fetus [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ] or its surrounding or associated tissues, such as placenta [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], amniotic cavity [ 13 , 14 , 26 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], and the yolk sac (YS) [ 36 ], using a glass micropipette (shown in Figure 1 B). The solution contains viral vectors (including recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs), lentiviruses, adenoviruses (Ad)), or nonviral vectors (including plasmid DNA).…”
Section: In Utero Gene Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%