The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-017-2223-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissolving Microneedle Patches for Dermal Vaccination

Abstract: The dermal route is an attractive route for vaccine delivery due to the easy skin accessibility and a dense network of immune cells in the skin. The development of microneedles is crucial to take advantage of the skin immunization and simultaneously to overcome problems related to vaccination by conventional needles (e.g. pain, needle-stick injuries or needle re-use). This review focuses on dissolving microneedles that after penetration into the skin dissolve releasing the encapsulated antigen. The microneedle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common indication of conventional microneedle systems is in vaccine administration [11,12]. In such cases, only a small number of applications would be necessary to achieve the desired immunological effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common indication of conventional microneedle systems is in vaccine administration [11,12]. In such cases, only a small number of applications would be necessary to achieve the desired immunological effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it can be expected that MNs will need to be sterilized for any clinical application. Though no specific guidelines currently exist, due to the novelty of MN‐based technologies, based on FDA guidelines for medical devices which are in direct contact with lymphatic tissues, the endotoxin content in MNs should be < 20 EU per device . While fully aseptic preparation would ensure sterility, this could dramatically increase manufacturing costs, thereby generating interest in terminal sterilization methods, including heat and irradiation.…”
Section: Translational Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though no specific guidelines currently exist, due to the novelty of MN-based technologies, based on FDA guidelines for medical devices which are in direct contact with lymphatic tissues, the endotoxin content in MNs should be < 20 EU per device. [122] While fully aseptic preparation would ensure sterility, this could dramatically increase manufacturing costs, thereby generating interest in terminal sterilization methods, including heat and irradiation. Heat-sterilization would likely be suitable for some MNs, including solid metal and silicon arrays, but would be incompatible with dissolving polymer, hydrogel, or complex hollow MNs devices.…”
Section: Translational Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MNs may be fabricated from various materials including metal, silicon, carbohydrates, or FDA-approved biocompatible polymers and their mode of action is dependent upon the fabrication method [61]. In general, these materials should be biocompatible, have low toxicity, sufficient strength/toughness and be cost-effective [62]. Solid MNs are most often used in a two-step procedure, whereby the MN patch is firstly applied to the skin surface, temporarily disrupting its natural permeability barrier, prior to the 21 application of either a patch or topical formulation.…”
Section: Microneedle Arrays Circumvent Skin Barrier Functions and Facmentioning
confidence: 99%