Increasing students’ physical activity during school physical education: rationale and protocol for the SELF-FIT cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundThe Self-determined Exercise and Learning For FITness (SELF-FIT) is a multi-component school-based intervention based on tenets of self-determination theory. SELF-FIT aims to increase students’ moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during physical education lessons, and enhance their autonomous motivation towards fitness activities. Using a cluster randomized controlled trial, we aim to examine the effects of the intervention on students’ MVPA during school physical education.MethodsSecondary 2 students (approximately aged 14 years) from 26 classes in 26 different schools will be recruited. After baseline assessments, students will be randomized into either the experimental group or wait-list control group using a matched-pair randomization. Teachers allocated to the experimental group will attend two half-day workshops and deliver the SELF-FIT intervention for 8 weeks. The main intervention components include training teachers to teach in more need supportive ways, and conducting fitness exercises using a fitness dice with interchangeable faces. Other motivational components, such as playing music during classes, are also included. The primary outcome of the trial is students’ MVPA during PE lessons. Secondary outcomes include students’ leisure-time MVPA, perceived need support from teachers, need satisfaction, autonomous motivation towards physical education, intention to engage in physical activity, psychological well-being, and health-related fitness (cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness). Quantitative data will be analyzed using multilevel modeling approaches. Focus group interviews will also be conducted to assess students’ perceptions of the intervention.DiscussionThe SELF-FIT intervention has been designed to improve students’ health and well-being by using high-intensity activities in classes delivered by teachers who have been trained to be autonomy needs supportive. If successful, scalable interventions based on SELF-FIT could be applied in physical education at large.Trial registrationThe trial is registered at the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12615000633583; date of registration: 18 June 2015).

Tracking Children’s Physical Activity Patterns across the School Year: A Mixed-Methods Longitudinal Case Study

“…KS2 children’s focus groups also highlighted a need for younger children to be consulted in designing PA extra-curricular programmes, which offered greater variety: “They might not like it, so they might not want to do it.”; “See what they like the most and start things to do with them.”; “Get the school more active and more sporty and more sports clubs.”; “…and also offer more opportunities for clubs…” This indicates that the opportunities for PA within this particular school encourage PA for older children specifically, and there is a need to consider PA opportunities for younger children. However, the school-based PA findings do support the concept of the school being a supportive platform for PA promotion [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], and therefore schools are effective locations for staging PA interventions.…”

Promoting physical activity in children through family-based intervention: protocol of the “Active 1 + FUN” randomized controlled trial

“…These sessions will highlight the concepts of MVPA (i.e., huff and puff activity), FMS, motivation, and “co-physical activity”. There will be a gameplay period within the session, using innovative tools and methods, such as methods previously developed by Ha, Lonsdale, Lubans and Ng [41]. These will be followed by a skill development period using a set of easy sports equipment, including skipping rope, soft volleyball, sponge flying disc, which will be given to participants for free.…”

Dissemination and implementation of a policy on school health in public schools: A systematic review

“…The review revealed studies that advocated the need for programme development and research as evidence to disseminate and implement policies on school health, whereas other studies revealed measures in which the programme and research materials would be the following: delivery of evidence-based information, development of policies and action guides (Chiang et al 2015 :779; Ha et al 2018 :11; Nathan et al 2016 :106; Robinson et al 2014 :S76). However, other studies have revealed that programme manuals have been adopted, and theories have been tested and used as evidence to disseminate and implement a policy on school health; thus, such evidence should be utilised (Chiang et al 2015 :779; Larson et al 2017b:208; Tapia et al 2017 :530; Vanneste et al 2016 :6).…”