Use of two miniplates to achieve intraoperative maxillomandibular fixation

Rai, Anshul; Jain, Anuj; Rasal, S.

doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2017.06.013

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Magnesium composites were made with a content of 5% wt. CA (referring to Campo's research [8]). Mg and CA powders (weight 91.1 mg/sample) were mixed manually and dried using vacuum drying (LabTech) at 200 °C for 12 hours (referring to Gu [10]) and ± -0.096 MPa pressure.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Characteristics Investigation of the Initial Development of Miniplate Made from Composite of Magnesium/Carbonate Apatite Fabricated by Powder Metallurgy Method for Biodegradable Implant Applications

Setyadi

Pribadi

Marsetio

et al. 2020

KEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of magnesium-based materials, applied for a biodegradable implant, attracted the attention of many researchers. In this research, the initial development of the Mg/carbonate apatite (CA) miniplate was carried out. The miniplate Mg/5CA is fabricated through powder metallurgy and is followed by a sintering process. Pure magnesium is also fabricated with the same process and is used as a reference. The visual form, microstructure (OM), bending test and corrosion test of miniplate were investigated. The results showed that the visual form of the Mg/5CA miniplate is still not perfect. Flexural stress, flexural strain, and elasticity modulus were obtained at 34.02 MPa, 0.9%, and 3.53 GPa, respectively. The corrosion rate is obtained at 12.64 mm/year. The compaction process of Mg/5CA powder followed by sintering is considered to be less appropriate. The addition of the extrusion process and/or the ECAP process in fabrication can be an option to improve its properties.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the bone implant types that need to be developed with biodegradable material is a miniplate implant for the maxillofacial bone [8]. One of the researches on the development of biodegradable miniplate was reported by Supriadi [9] related to the fabrication of the ECAP magnesium miniplate…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characteristics Investigation of the Initial Development of Miniplate Made from Composite of Magnesium/Carbonate Apatite Fabricated by Powder Metallurgy Method for Biodegradable Implant Applications

Setyadi

Pribadi

Marsetio

et al. 2020

KEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Traditionally, Ivy eyelets wiring, Risdon wiring, metal splints, acrylic splints and Erich arch bars are used. 4 Progressively, new techniques such as Intermaxillary Fixation (IMF) screws, 5 wiring around single tooth with tight contacts, 6 use of 2 miniplates, 7 use of zip ties, 8 use of bondable buttons, 9 2 looped wires 10 have been developed to expedite securement of MMF.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the Use of Intermaxillary Fixation Screws an Alternative to Erich Arch Bars for Maxillomandibular Fixation During Management of Maxillofacial Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jain¹,

Rai

2020

Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) is a step of paramount importance during the management of maxillofacial trauma. Erich arch bars are being used for this purpose for decades but with advances in maxillofacial trauma management, intermaxillary fixation screws came into existence and are being used routinely. The present study was designed to identify if the intermaxillary fixation screws are really an alternative to Erich arch bars for management of maxillofacial trauma. Methodology: An exhaustive literature search was conducted in May 2020 on various electronic databases and studies comparing Erich arch bars and intermaxillary fixation screws were recruited for the analysis. Random-effects model with Mantel Haenszel statistics was used to analyze oral hygiene and duration of achieving MMF. Results: A total of 96 studies were identified, out of which 8 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in oral hygiene status of the patients in both the groups. Intermaxillary fixations screws required statistically significantly less time in achieving MMF. Needle stick injury was prominently seen with the use of Erich arch bar whereas other complications like mucosal coverage, root injury, screw loosening and screw fracture makes the use of intermaxillary fixation screws questionable. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis suggests that there is not enough evidence to recommend the use of intermaxillary fixation screws as an alternative to Erich arch bars. Further research with large sample size, high quality evidence and better methodology is recommended in this direction.

show abstract

What is a better modality of maxillomandibular fixation: bone-supported arch bars or Erich arch bars? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jain¹,

Taneja²,

Rai³

2021

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Use of two miniplates to achieve intraoperative maxillomandibular fixation

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Characteristics Investigation of the Initial Development of Miniplate Made from Composite of Magnesium/Carbonate Apatite Fabricated by Powder Metallurgy Method for Biodegradable Implant Applications

Characteristics Investigation of the Initial Development of Miniplate Made from Composite of Magnesium/Carbonate Apatite Fabricated by Powder Metallurgy Method for Biodegradable Implant Applications

Is the Use of Intermaxillary Fixation Screws an Alternative to Erich Arch Bars for Maxillomandibular Fixation During Management of Maxillofacial Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

What is a better modality of maxillomandibular fixation: bone-supported arch bars or Erich arch bars? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About