2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renovascular CT: comparison between adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one pediatric study the reported sensitivity and specificity were higher at 88% and 81% respectively [20]. Recent studies have demonstrated that full iterative reconstruction techniques of CTA can reduce noise and increase contrast [2426]. In particular, model-based iterative reconstruction has been reported to improve the accuracy of vessel diameter measurements [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one pediatric study the reported sensitivity and specificity were higher at 88% and 81% respectively [20]. Recent studies have demonstrated that full iterative reconstruction techniques of CTA can reduce noise and increase contrast [2426]. In particular, model-based iterative reconstruction has been reported to improve the accuracy of vessel diameter measurements [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various AI algorithms have also been applied and developed in the field of medical imaging. e iterative reconstruction algorithm under AI can achieve noise control through the description and expression of noise characteristics, so it has been widely used in the reconstruction of low-dose CT imaging, of which the ASiR algorithm is the most widely used [19][20][21][22]. erefore, the effect of CT image reconstruction using the ASiR algorithm under AI was evaluated through subjective evaluation and objective measurement firstly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make INDIA comparable to an optimization process such as NLR, we should define a cost function that INDIA can minimize. Fortunately, the constraint of the limited support can be interpreted as an operation in which one looks for the magnitude |T|k that minimizes the value of the mean background noise [27], where the background is the entire area outside the a priori known object support. In comparison to other nonlinear algorithms, we conclude that INDIA performs an extensive search over N×M variables of the magnitude |T|k that minimize a limited cost function, whereas NLR and LRRA search over only two variables that can minimize an unlimited number of cost functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%