2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12915-017-0389-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory coding from the periphery to higher brain centers in the Drosophila brain

Abstract: BackgroundOdor information is processed through multiple receptor-glomerular channels in the first order olfactory center, the antennal lobe (AL), then reformatted into higher brain centers and eventually perceived by the fly. To reveal the logic of olfaction, it is fundamental to map odor representations from the glomerular channels into higher brain centers.ResultsWe characterize odor response profiles of AL projection neurons (PNs) originating from 31 glomeruli using whole cell patch-clamp recordings in Dro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(33 reference statements)
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification of the evoked mean responses to specific odors showed that excitatory as well as inhibitory odor responses were, on average, stronger at the PN level than at the OSN level ( Fig. 7B) which is well in line with electrophysiological recordings (Wilson and Laurent, 2005;Bhandawat et al, 2007;Seki et al, 2017). To visualize how the odor-specific responses evolve over time, we applied principal component analyses to reduce the multidimensional, spatiotemporal activity/inhibition to three dimensions and illustrated the odor-evoked ensemble activity as trajectories over time (Fig.…”
Section: Input-output Transformationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Quantification of the evoked mean responses to specific odors showed that excitatory as well as inhibitory odor responses were, on average, stronger at the PN level than at the OSN level ( Fig. 7B) which is well in line with electrophysiological recordings (Wilson and Laurent, 2005;Bhandawat et al, 2007;Seki et al, 2017). To visualize how the odor-specific responses evolve over time, we applied principal component analyses to reduce the multidimensional, spatiotemporal activity/inhibition to three dimensions and illustrated the odor-evoked ensemble activity as trajectories over time (Fig.…”
Section: Input-output Transformationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Compared to our prior findings in Pheidole [Ilieş et al, 2015], the results of our present study suggest that selection on brain organization differs in these formicine species (Table 1). The utility of our covariance analysis is validated by neuroanatomy: brain regions that were statistically correlated in the present work are known to have functional neural connections in insects [Strausfeld et al, 2009;Martin et al, 2011;Brill et al, 2015;Kinoshita and Homberg, 2017;Seki et al, 2017]. The correlations we identified between MB subregion size (LC and MC; MC and PL), for example, appear to reflect neurobiological organization, given that the LC and the MC receive similar primary sensory inputs, and the underlying afferent projections from the calyces form the PL [Fahrbach, 2006].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The community PN axonal arbor territories s are similar to those obtained in earlier studies based on light microscopy data (c.f. cluster 1 in Figure 4 C&D Jefferis et al, 2007; Seki et al, 2017; c.f. green cluster in Figure 2 C,E Tanaka et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%