2017
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of upper limb spasticity in stroke patients using the robotic device REAplan

Abstract: This study proposes a new, valid, reliable and sensitive protocol to quantify upper limb resistance force using the REAplan, as a reflection of upper limb spasticity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Picture of upper limb end-effectors rehabilitation robots: a Inmotion2/Mitmanus [ 79 ], b wrist robot [ 80 ], c REAPlan [ 81 ] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Picture of upper limb end-effectors rehabilitation robots: a Inmotion2/Mitmanus [ 79 ], b wrist robot [ 80 ], c REAPlan [ 81 ] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the quick-stretch technique is an easy, common strategy by which clinicians can induce abnormal muscle tone, and the MAS assessment is widely used clinically as well, the inconsistency of the force applied from the examiners and the subjective scoring are concerns that should not be ignored [11] , [13] [16] . To solve the problems related to the current muscle tone scoring system, previous researchers have used EMG, torque, or force sensors to quantify muscle tone [10] , [12] , [17] [27] . However, these methods established in previous studies have not been practically used in clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitively measure muscle tone, many research groups have used EMG, torque, or force sensors to record spasticity data [10] , [12] , [17] [27] . Although the results were found to be valid, this approach has still not been widely applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the first experimental day (D1), the patients/HIs trained their paretic/nondominant UL on a MSkL task with an SAT (CIRCUIT) 20 , 21 that was implemented on a REAplan neurorehabilitation robot 22 , 23 (Axinesis, Wavre, Belgium; used for motor measures: throughout the study, it did not deliver assistance). To quantify motor control within the same environment, they performed a REACHING task on each day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%