“…Previous studies have shown that orthorhombic pyrochlores, such as CsFeFeF 6 ( f = 19), RbFeFeF 6 ( f = 17), and CsMnMnF 6 ( f = 4), exhibit lower magnetic frustration compared to their cubic counterparts, including CsNiFeF 6 ( f = 37), CsCoFeF 6 ( f = 54), and CsMnFeF 6 ( f = 11). ,,− Therefore, we are interested in studying β-pyrochlores having cubic symmetry in order to test their magnetic frustration. The cubic pyrochlore compositions reported in the literature were obtained using the flux method, and some of the orthorhombic charge-ordered pyrochlores were synthesized using both flux and mild hydrothermal methods. , Although cubic AM 2+ M 3+ F 6 pyrochlores (A = Cs and Rb; M 2+ = Co 2+ , Ni 2+ , and Mn 2+ ; and M 3+ = Fe 3+ and Cr 3+ ) have been studied for their magnetism, those with M 3+ = V 3+ remain unexplored.…”