The agglomeration state of nanoparticles can influence the mechanism of their cellular internalisation

Abstract

BackgroundSignificant progress of nanotechnology, including in particular biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, has resulted in a high number of studies describing the biological effects of nanomaterials. Moreover, a determination of so-called “critical quality attributes”, that is specific physicochemical properties of nanomaterials triggering the observed biological response, has been recognised as crucial for the evaluation and design of novel safe and efficacious therapeutics. In the context of in vitro studies, a thorough physicochemical characterisation of nanoparticles (NPs), also in the biological medium, is necessary to allow a correlation with a cellular response. Following this concept, we examined whether the main and frequently reported characteristics of NPs such as size and the agglomeration state can influence the level and the mechanism of NP cellular internalization.ResultsWe employed fluorescently-labelled 30 and 80 nm silicon dioxide NPs, both in agglomerated and non-agglomerated form. Using flow cytometry, transmission electron microscopy, the inhibitors of endocytosis and gene silencing we determined the most probable routes of cellular uptake for each form of tested silica NPs. We observed differences in cellular uptake depending on the size and the agglomeration state of NPs. Caveolae-mediated endocytosis was implicated particularly in the internalisation of well dispersed silica NPs but with an increase of the agglomeration state of NPs a combination of endocytic pathways with a predominant role of macropinocytosis was noted.ConclusionsWe demonstrated that the agglomeration state of NPs is an important factor influencing the level of cell uptake and the mechanism of endocytosis of silica NPs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12951-017-0281-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nanoparticles and danger signals: Oral delivery vehicles as potential disruptors of intestinal barrier homeostasis

“…To date, studies demonstrate that the mechanisms of cellular uptake can occur through both endocytosis‐dependent and endocytosis‐independent mechanisms. Studies involving IEC lines have indicated that endocytosis‐dependent mechanisms of cell entry include clathrin‐, caveolin‐, and EGFR‐mediated endocytosis, as well as macropinocytosis . Brun et al., 2014, suggested the mechanism and magnitude of NP uptake by intestinal epithelium to be largely influenced by presence of microvilli; NP endocytosis was reduced in cells with extensive microvilli (e.g., enterocytes), instead passing by paracellular transport with concomitant disruption of tight junctions, whereas NPs were readily endocytosed by goblet and M cells (Fig.…”

“…The variability of entry route is thought to be dependent on the particles’ physicochemical characteristics, such as size and agglomeration state . Various particle coatings can also influence mechanism of NP uptake, and can be both intentionally applied prior to administration or acquired as a biocorona through molecular interactions with various proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids within the body .…”

An effective “three-in-one” screening assay for testing drug and nanoparticle toxicity in human endothelial cells

“…The conventional approach to studying the toxicity of soluble compounds often displays unexpected limitations when utilized to study the interaction of NPs with the cells. The outcome of the NP-cell interactions can be greatly influenced by a number of factors such as the nature of the protein corona covering the NPs, or their agglomeration state [ 37 ]. These properties might be difficult to control and can produce stochastic results, which are difficult to interpret.…”

Dye-doped silica nanoparticles: synthesis, surface chemistry and bioapplications

“…However, assessing the toxicity of colloidal silica NPs remains unresolved and is particularly hampered by the lack of agreed experimental protocols. This has meant a variety of different experimental parameters have been studied: NP size (Kim et al 2015) and agglomeration-state (Giovannini et al 2018b;Halamoda-Kenzaoui et al 2017), NP surface chemistry (Hsiao et al 2019), NP corona composition, (Lee et al 2015) particle concentration (Kim et al 2015) and cell type (Kim et al 2015). This wide variation in experimental conditions has therefore led to a lack of consensus on whether colloidal silica can be definitively considered to be toxic (Krug 2014).…”