2017
DOI: 10.1111/tid.12741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Across state lines: Fulminant Babesia microti infection in a liver transplant recipient

Abstract: The potential for transmission of Babesia microti by blood transfusion is well recognized. Physicians may be unaware that products used for transfusion may be collected from geographically diverse regions. We describe a liver transplant recipient in South Carolina who likely acquired B. microti infection from a unit of blood collected in Minnesota.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exceptions were two donors from non‐endemic states (California and Georgia) who traveled back home after vacationing in Massachusetts and Maine, and one donor from North Carolina without relevant recent travel history. The North Carolina donor's weak testing results (PCR negative, AFIA 1:64) suggest that the second positive donor identified during the investigation, a Minnesota resident who was PCR and AFIA positive (1:512) for B. microti , was likely responsible for the transmission in this case . Babesiosis is not a reportable disease in North Carolina and no cases have been reported in the state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exceptions were two donors from non‐endemic states (California and Georgia) who traveled back home after vacationing in Massachusetts and Maine, and one donor from North Carolina without relevant recent travel history. The North Carolina donor's weak testing results (PCR negative, AFIA 1:64) suggest that the second positive donor identified during the investigation, a Minnesota resident who was PCR and AFIA positive (1:512) for B. microti , was likely responsible for the transmission in this case . Babesiosis is not a reportable disease in North Carolina and no cases have been reported in the state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Most donors (78, 97%) were residents of the northeastern and upper midwestern United States, known to be endemic for B. microti . One exception was a donor who resided in North Carolina, identified in a case involving two positive donors (Table ; one donor from North Carolina and the second from Minnesota) . Two additional cases, not shown on the maps, are from donors residing in Georgia and California who donated in their state of residence after traveling to Maine and Massachusetts, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTB is also not geographically bound, given that blood donors from non-endemic areas may travel to endemic areas where they can acquire the infection through tick bite, return to the non-endemic area and donate infectious blood. Finally, blood that is collected in endemic states is frequently shipped to states that are not considered high risk for babesiosis, also accounting for cases of TTB in non-endemic states [47,48,49].…”
Section: Persistent Babesia Microti Infection In Asymptomatic Immumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two additional cases of infection in patients who received transfusions in nonendemic areas have recently been reported to the blood collection agency. Case 5 is a man who underwent liver transplantation, received a transfusion in South Carolina, and developed severe clinical babesiosis . Case 6 is a woman with ovarian cancer who received a transfusion in Nebraska with a RBC unit collected from a donor who later screened positive for B. microti ; the recipient in Case 6 did not develop clinical symptoms of babesiosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%