2017
DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-17-00320.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Program Performance in the Next Accreditation System (NAS): Results of the 2015–2016 Annual Data Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Change in the world of GME was compounded by the introduction of the duty hour requirements at about the same time [53]. The ACGME has moved further along the path of competency-based training with the introduction of milestones as a focus of the new accreditation system (NAS) [54, 55]. Competencies also have been linked to Entrustable Professional Activities [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change in the world of GME was compounded by the introduction of the duty hour requirements at about the same time [53]. The ACGME has moved further along the path of competency-based training with the introduction of milestones as a focus of the new accreditation system (NAS) [54, 55]. Competencies also have been linked to Entrustable Professional Activities [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…96 In recent years, pathology programs have been busy adapting to current trends in graduate medical education, including competency-based education (six ACGME competencies), milestones, the rise of postresidency fellowships, and maintenance of certification. [97][98][99][100] In undergraduate medical education, the pathology course encompassing general and systems pathology occupied a pivotal role in the Flexnerian two-pillar model of medical education. 21,22 Pathology education became strongly influenced by Stanley Robbins' textbook, first published in 1957, which linked anatomic pathology to pathophysiology and clinical correlation and had a vibrant writing style.…”
Section: Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reviewed by the RCs include program characteristics, participating teaching sites, changes in faculty and program leadership, resident and faculty attrition, faculty and resident scholarly activity, the annual ACGME Resident/ Fellow and Faculty Surveys, resident clinical and case log experience, and program-level performance on the certification examinations of the American Board of Medical Specialties member boards. 2 Upon annual review of these data, the RCs issue an updated accreditation status to each program. RCs may request a progress report if they identify potential problems or request a site visit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%