2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of two multidimensional self-reported physical activity questionnaires in people with chronic low back pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 160 participants (80 patients per group) will be required to detect a 20% between-group difference in physical activity levels (mean difference between groups of 59.2 counts per min, a standard deviation of 111.6 counts per min) with a power of 0.80, alpha of 0.05 accounting for a 15% loss to follow-up. The counts per min parameters used in the sample size calculation are from a previous study conducted with a similar population [ 22 ]. The total of 160 participants is enough to detect a between-group difference of 1 point (standard deviation (SD) = 1.84) in the numerical pain rating scale and of 4 points (SD = 4.9) in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) with a power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05 and 15% dropout as reported in a previous trial with this population [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 160 participants (80 patients per group) will be required to detect a 20% between-group difference in physical activity levels (mean difference between groups of 59.2 counts per min, a standard deviation of 111.6 counts per min) with a power of 0.80, alpha of 0.05 accounting for a 15% loss to follow-up. The counts per min parameters used in the sample size calculation are from a previous study conducted with a similar population [ 22 ]. The total of 160 participants is enough to detect a between-group difference of 1 point (standard deviation (SD) = 1.84) in the numerical pain rating scale and of 4 points (SD = 4.9) in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) with a power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05 and 15% dropout as reported in a previous trial with this population [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common methods applied to the evaluation of physical activity in persons with chronic pain are self-evaluation questionnaires, such as the international physical activity questionnaire or Baecke physical activity questionnaire (BPAQ). However, these methods have shown a lack of agreement regarding the estimates of physical activity obtained from sensor devices [133][134][135][136]. Moreover, patients with high levels of depression use to underscore their activity level [135].…”
Section: Accelerometry-based Activity Evaluation and Chronic Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient-related factors: The following factors will be measured at baseline: 1) sociodemographic characteristics (i.e. age, gender, marital status, education level, height, weight); 2) physical activity (measured with the International Physical Activity questionnaire [15]); 3) other lifestyle variables smoking; measured by pack years, alcohol use measured by the short version of the AUDIT-C [17,18], sleeping habits; measured by the short version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [19]; 4) comorbidities using the Selfadministered Comorbidity Questionnaire [20] and 7)…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current BACE-C consortium study has been modelled after the 'BAck Complaints in Elders' study (BACE), which is an international cohort study devoted to examining back complaints in older people in primary care [17]. The BACE-C study is set in chiropractic care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%