2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low rate of access site complications after transradial coronary catheterization: A prospective ultrasound study

Abstract: BackgroundTransradial artery (TRA) left heart catheterization is an increasingly used technique for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. This study evaluates the incidence of access site complications in the current interventional era.Methods and resultsA total of 507 procedures were performed under standardized conditions. Each procedure was performed using high levels of anticoagulation, hydrophilic sheaths, and short post-procedural compression times. Vascular complications were assessed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our study, multiple puncture attempts for radial artery access are reported to increase vascular injury and radial artery spasm, which leads to radial artery thrombosis (31,32). Prior studies have also reported that the incidence of RAO progressively increased with sheath size, although results were not consistent in all the studies (3,9,10,21,22,26,31,33,34). Furthermore, Rashid et al (13), in a meta-analysis, have evaluated the effect of sheath size among 19 studies, and the incidence of RAO ranged from nil to 19.5% according to used sheath size (0%, 2%, 11%, and 19.5%, respectively, for sheath size of 4F, 5F, 6F, and 7F, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Similar to our study, multiple puncture attempts for radial artery access are reported to increase vascular injury and radial artery spasm, which leads to radial artery thrombosis (31,32). Prior studies have also reported that the incidence of RAO progressively increased with sheath size, although results were not consistent in all the studies (3,9,10,21,22,26,31,33,34). Furthermore, Rashid et al (13), in a meta-analysis, have evaluated the effect of sheath size among 19 studies, and the incidence of RAO ranged from nil to 19.5% according to used sheath size (0%, 2%, 11%, and 19.5%, respectively, for sheath size of 4F, 5F, 6F, and 7F, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The RA is a small-sized artery whose diameter ranges from 1.15 to 3.95 mm (8). Smaller RADs have been associated with vascular complications (9,10). Multiple puncture attempts increase the risk of vasospasm and may result in hemorrhage, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, thrombosis and pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the radial artery (RA) is smaller than the femoral artery[ 3 ], and TRA is associated with a higher prevalence of acute injuries and chronic intimal changes [ 7 , 8 ]. RA occlusions rate is usually low and remain mostly asymptomatic [ 9 ]. Previous studies investigated qualitative RA vessel wall changes after TRC in a non-serial manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%